You think maybe Bort could have something against CODB?
Unconquered
offline
offline
Originally posted by Mikiesdaman
You think maybe Bort could have something against CODB?
Post it in the bugs section and send me the link to the thread. I'll back you up.
You think maybe Bort could have something against CODB?
Post it in the bugs section and send me the link to the thread. I'll back you up.
Last edited Jul 12, 2008 16:28:09
Originally posted by salizy13
Obviosly its the lack of strategy. In no way can the sim screw someone. Its like saying on your way to work red lights purposely screw you. Its dumb to think that and its clear strategy is to blame
I see that city guy out there every day, screwing with the timing of the lights. He knows just how long it takes to get between intersections and sets the lights so they switch to red just as I approach every intersection. I know he's doing it because I tried to run him over 3-weeks ago and I have been late getting to work ever since.
Obviosly its the lack of strategy. In no way can the sim screw someone. Its like saying on your way to work red lights purposely screw you. Its dumb to think that and its clear strategy is to blame
I see that city guy out there every day, screwing with the timing of the lights. He knows just how long it takes to get between intersections and sets the lights so they switch to red just as I approach every intersection. I know he's doing it because I tried to run him over 3-weeks ago and I have been late getting to work ever since.
baseball52
offline
offline
Originally posted by Mikiesdaman
You think maybe Bort could have something against CODB?
Good then we make the playoffs.
You think maybe Bort could have something against CODB?
Good then we make the playoffs.
Mo Shun
offline
offline
Viewer at home watching this, thinks to himself, "I'm really getting screwed by the cable company charging me for this ESPN "The Ocho" channel."
Whispersoft
offline
offline
Originally posted by Unconquered
Originally posted by Mikiesdaman
You think maybe Bort could have something against CODB?
Post it in the bugs section and send me the link to the thread. I'll back you up.
Ok you are on fire... I'll back it too... just for the good of the league and all you know ;-)
Originally posted by Mikiesdaman
You think maybe Bort could have something against CODB?
Post it in the bugs section and send me the link to the thread. I'll back you up.
Ok you are on fire... I'll back it too... just for the good of the league and all you know ;-)
MikieSoSmooth
offline
offline
New Subject. Alot of owners and GM's are starting to work together with teams in their own leagues and conferences. SOme are even becoming GM's and advisors with conference foes. Is this a healthy, friendly practice, or is this bad medicine for the future of the league?
salizy13
offline
offline
personally I dont mind it. Baseball52 gmz for me right now and gambrinus is going to become my dc next season. I think it provides intresing team forums and league forums plus everyone here has the maturity to stay out of the situation if the teams playeach other
Unconquered
offline
offline
Originally posted by Mikiesdaman
New Subject. Alot of owners and GM's are starting to work together with teams in their own leagues and conferences. SOme are even becoming GM's and advisors with conference foes. Is this a healthy, friendly practice, or is this bad medicine for the future of the league?
I don't think it's a problem. I think after two awesome seasons in the BBB 12 there isn't an Owner who'd pick cheating and winning a game over being shunned by the league.
New Subject. Alot of owners and GM's are starting to work together with teams in their own leagues and conferences. SOme are even becoming GM's and advisors with conference foes. Is this a healthy, friendly practice, or is this bad medicine for the future of the league?
I don't think it's a problem. I think after two awesome seasons in the BBB 12 there isn't an Owner who'd pick cheating and winning a game over being shunned by the league.
baseball52
offline
offline
Originally posted by Unconquered
Originally posted by Mikiesdaman
New Subject. Alot of owners and GM's are starting to work together with teams in their own leagues and conferences. SOme are even becoming GM's and advisors with conference foes. Is this a healthy, friendly practice, or is this bad medicine for the future of the league?
I don't think it's a problem. I think after two awesome seasons in the BBB 12 there isn't an Owner who'd pick cheating and winning a game over being shunned by the league.
+1
Originally posted by salizy13
personally I dont mind it. Baseball52 gmz for me right now and gambrinus is going to become my dc next season. I think it provides intresing team forums and league forums plus everyone here has the maturity to stay out of the situation if the teams playeach other
+1
Originally posted by Mikiesdaman
New Subject. Alot of owners and GM's are starting to work together with teams in their own leagues and conferences. SOme are even becoming GM's and advisors with conference foes. Is this a healthy, friendly practice, or is this bad medicine for the future of the league?
I don't think it's a problem. I think after two awesome seasons in the BBB 12 there isn't an Owner who'd pick cheating and winning a game over being shunned by the league.
+1
Originally posted by salizy13
personally I dont mind it. Baseball52 gmz for me right now and gambrinus is going to become my dc next season. I think it provides intresing team forums and league forums plus everyone here has the maturity to stay out of the situation if the teams playeach other
+1
salizy13
offline
offline
also I think having another teams view of yours is beneficial to showing you what u do right and wrong
Whispersoft
offline
offline
and just throwing in 2cents here, Unless the GM screws the team when they play against each other most of the info gained you can see anyway if you scout enough. Only details of player builds but we do not have a fine enough control to take real advantage of that yet.
And as others have said the shunning and over all bad mouthing of a GM who did this to screw a team would be a good reason not to do it. In the end the "sim screws teams"(trade mark pending on this one ;-) more than a GM could... well except one who sells off an entire team but that is another story.
Full disclosure I am one of those who owns and GMs a little on the side, two teams. It would never cross my mind and if we play each other I want to be taken off just so I cannot even begin to gain any advantage, and we've already agreed on this.
And as others have said the shunning and over all bad mouthing of a GM who did this to screw a team would be a good reason not to do it. In the end the "sim screws teams"(trade mark pending on this one ;-) more than a GM could... well except one who sells off an entire team but that is another story.
Full disclosure I am one of those who owns and GMs a little on the side, two teams. It would never cross my mind and if we play each other I want to be taken off just so I cannot even begin to gain any advantage, and we've already agreed on this.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
