Warrior General Games

So...Issue is......blow out games ie imbalance between Totally Human Roster v Totally CPU ( or less than Human Roster )
So, to reduce imbalace, what if in some Leagues ( or even Casual ), there was a limit of say ,35 Human Players on a team - the rest had to be CPU.
It would mean the existing Human Talent would be spread out more evenly across all the teams, meaning closer games.
Also get rid of D Leagues, but keep dedicated CPU teams in each League, so you still have the option to not play for a human owner, but it may sorta incentivise some players to play for a Human Team instead because CPU owned team probably wont win PO's, and salary will be less hence, hit to moral.
I've use D League, but its a bit frustraring seeing odd players , sitting on D league Teams, refusing Contract Offers.

-1 to getting rid of D leagues

Originally posted by drewd21
-1 to getting rid of D leagues

People shouldn't have to accept your offer just because you sent one.

I could support a smaller roster size but not like this. Getting 55 human players is tough for some of us.

Originally posted by drewd21
-1 to getting rid of D leagues
+1000%!!!


Originally posted by Kurt Davey
People shouldn't have to accept your offer just because you sent one.
We don't address people with the moniker; Comrade' or 'Citizen'!!!

As a further adieu:
D-League serves a purpose to the overall health of the game. What I'd like to see is an addition, where your dot doesn't get cut from a D-League team randomly, as opposed to willfully

Roster sizes should have been decreased with the reboot IMO. 55 players in a game with no injuries is too many.

ngth

Fwiw... Casual isn't a whole lot different than D-leagues at this point. Everyone is running the same Ai.

D-leagues are probably the distopian future of GLB. That's what the D stands for.

Anyone interested in getting the D-league Challenge script up and running again?

If you drop the D League, you might be getting more players without EQ and boosters on your team.
If you switch over to a 35 man rosters, some of the agents might actually spend more to build themselves a full team instead of just a 55 dot team. .
If you don't drop the D League teams, you could also allow for non booster and EQ teams to be developed. Block Boosting and EQ. When those dots hit their level, put in an option to purchase full boost and EQ for an X amount of Flex points
You might actually gain profit from dots that can't afford EQ. This could help the profitability for GLB.
Since we have several agents with multiple accounts, you can get more agents to double up on accounts for more teams
However, once a team hits pro level, those teams can have a 55 man roster. This will keep depth chart at the upper levels in line with the option for example LOLB and LOLB 1's ect.
A thirty five dot team will be twenty less players per team for an agent to purchase.

Some agents just love the game, however, some can't afford to buy EQ and full boosts. A lot of these agents are better off to play for the D leagues teams.
We then ask agents to spend their flex points, If they don't, their dots aren't going to be the best of builds. This way will allow for them to play competitive with everyone an option to buy at the end of the build may help profits to trend upwards. Some agents with non boosting and EQ leagues will stay instead of being ran off.

Originally posted by xylo
I've use D League, but its a bit frustraring seeing odd players , sitting on D league Teams, refusing Contract Offers.

https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4872448

wish I had stayed in D-league. I'll probably never sign with a team I don't know ever again.

https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/player_replays.pl?player_id=4872448&game_id=38123

Originally posted by Kurt Davey
People shouldn't have to accept your offer just because you sent one.

Get rid of D league at Pro level only. There are many aa cpu teams or casual they can still sign to.