Originally posted by TJ Spikes
https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3938152&page=2#35046016
There could be some random math fuckery involved, that wouldn't be a new thing. It's possible that Bort decided to fudge things so that Fake% works 100% of the time, and just nerfed the crap out of the baseline fake chance so that Vision + SV is balanced.
That's why I'm saying this is a superstition. I don't believe Bort would do something much more complex on purpose. I'd rather believe it's a simple as attribute + SA VS attribute + SA
I view Bort's comment as to when the ball is being thrown - the ball is in the air and vision and SV determine how fast the defender reacts
fakes can happen right off the line of scrimmage and are usually what creates great separation for receivers - once the ball is in the air you don't see the fakes any more you have now evolved into the pass reception / interception equations where the vision / SV come in
https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3938152&page=2#35046016
There could be some random math fuckery involved, that wouldn't be a new thing. It's possible that Bort decided to fudge things so that Fake% works 100% of the time, and just nerfed the crap out of the baseline fake chance so that Vision + SV is balanced.
That's why I'm saying this is a superstition. I don't believe Bort would do something much more complex on purpose. I'd rather believe it's a simple as attribute + SA VS attribute + SA
I view Bort's comment as to when the ball is being thrown - the ball is in the air and vision and SV determine how fast the defender reacts
fakes can happen right off the line of scrimmage and are usually what creates great separation for receivers - once the ball is in the air you don't see the fakes any more you have now evolved into the pass reception / interception equations where the vision / SV come in






























