Originally posted by wessimo
In GLB it seems like the higher level team wins 99% of the time. Just look at Zeta this week - the top 8 teams all won, the bottom 8 all lost. In real life even crappy teams pull a big upset every now and then.
Being on a pretty good team, I like having the feeling of confidence that we are pretty much always going to win when playing teams with lower level players. Still, the fact that upsets happen very rarely kind of takes some of the excitement out of the game.
Anyone else feel this way?
If there was more of parity (upsets and such) in this game, then wouldnt there be a problem with the programming of it? I would have more of a problem if it was chaotic...
In GLB it seems like the higher level team wins 99% of the time. Just look at Zeta this week - the top 8 teams all won, the bottom 8 all lost. In real life even crappy teams pull a big upset every now and then.
Being on a pretty good team, I like having the feeling of confidence that we are pretty much always going to win when playing teams with lower level players. Still, the fact that upsets happen very rarely kind of takes some of the excitement out of the game.
Anyone else feel this way?
If there was more of parity (upsets and such) in this game, then wouldnt there be a problem with the programming of it? I would have more of a problem if it was chaotic...
