I doubt any WL team throws that rarely under that threshold. Shallow crosses are pretty popular and its auto TD for guys in the redzone. Some WR's are going to be using SM and/or PTP, other than that u have G2G, MR.R, TS, SH, QF and Poss WR. Pick 5 of the 6. To me it's pretty important, not as much so as some of the others I listed but's up there.
Forum > FAQ's, Player Guides and Newbie Help > Solution for a WR getting ball knocked loose?
Time Trial
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
i have wrs on every team i oc without poss wr. very rarely are you throwing to wrs short of 10 yards. i think i do it less than 20 times a season.
Wasn't the anti-KL part of that VA active anywhere on the field or am I getting it backwards (or thinking of one of the other VAs with unclear two-part language)?
i have wrs on every team i oc without poss wr. very rarely are you throwing to wrs short of 10 yards. i think i do it less than 20 times a season.
Wasn't the anti-KL part of that VA active anywhere on the field or am I getting it backwards (or thinking of one of the other VAs with unclear two-part language)?
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by Sellars
I doubt any WL team throws that rarely under that threshold. Shallow crosses are pretty popular and its auto TD for guys in the redzone. Some WR's are going to be using SM and/or PTP, other than that u have G2G, MR.R, TS, SH, QF and Poss WR. Pick 5 of the 6. To me it's pretty important, not as much so as some of the others I listed but's up there.
Slow Starter, Track Star, Mr. Reliable, Quick Feet, Slot Machine, Go to Guy, Soft Hands....all among the VA's I generally take over Poss WR. I never put it on the slot guy unless he happens to be a pure poss WR.
I doubt any WL team throws that rarely under that threshold. Shallow crosses are pretty popular and its auto TD for guys in the redzone. Some WR's are going to be using SM and/or PTP, other than that u have G2G, MR.R, TS, SH, QF and Poss WR. Pick 5 of the 6. To me it's pretty important, not as much so as some of the others I listed but's up there.
Slow Starter, Track Star, Mr. Reliable, Quick Feet, Slot Machine, Go to Guy, Soft Hands....all among the VA's I generally take over Poss WR. I never put it on the slot guy unless he happens to be a pure poss WR.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by Donk3yMan
Mandatory without debate in casual imo
I dunno...I think casual is one place where I would definitely not use it outside of a pure possession WR. I might even add in Streaky in casual.
Mandatory without debate in casual imo
I dunno...I think casual is one place where I would definitely not use it outside of a pure possession WR. I might even add in Streaky in casual.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by Time Trial
Wasn't the anti-KL part of that VA active anywhere on the field or am I getting it backwards (or thinking of one of the other VAs with unclear two-part language)?
Ya but again...KL is not something I have ever worried about at WR. Seems pointless to me. I only really added in that the OP use it because he is worrying about how often he gets KL.
Wasn't the anti-KL part of that VA active anywhere on the field or am I getting it backwards (or thinking of one of the other VAs with unclear two-part language)?
Ya but again...KL is not something I have ever worried about at WR. Seems pointless to me. I only really added in that the OP use it because he is worrying about how often he gets KL.
Edited by bhall43 on Nov 25, 2013 16:02:30
Originally posted by bhall43
I dunno...I think casual is one place where I would definitely not use it outside of a pure possession WR. I might even add in Streaky in casual.
Nay, lots of short routes and you can't specify progressions or pick plays. Only 15 VA points for +30% KL resistance and +30% CB < 8 yards is a no-brainer for me. It is even more helpful for TEs. I go with very pass heavy casual offenses and I would say that it is required for just about every kind of scheme or preset I have tried to run there. There are occasions where certain guys should not use it but they are rare in my experience.
Other people may be able to get away without but it seems like a bad idea
I dunno...I think casual is one place where I would definitely not use it outside of a pure possession WR. I might even add in Streaky in casual.
Nay, lots of short routes and you can't specify progressions or pick plays. Only 15 VA points for +30% KL resistance and +30% CB < 8 yards is a no-brainer for me. It is even more helpful for TEs. I go with very pass heavy casual offenses and I would say that it is required for just about every kind of scheme or preset I have tried to run there. There are occasions where certain guys should not use it but they are rare in my experience.
Other people may be able to get away without but it seems like a bad idea
Edited by Donk3yMan on Nov 25, 2013 19:47:54
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by Donk3yMan
Nay, lots of short routes and you can't specify progressions or pick plays. Only 15 VA points for +30% KL resistance and +30% CB < 8 yards is a no-brainer for me. It is even more helpful for TEs. I go with very pass heavy casual offenses and I would say that it is required for just about every kind of scheme or preset I have tried to run there. There are occasions where certain guys should not use it but they are rare in my experience.
Other people may be able to get away without but it seems like a bad idea
TE's it is a no brainer. But WR's....eh...just seems like there are better uses to me. I would like to see a study on the amount of passes people make to WR's under 8 yards in casual to make a decision.
Nay, lots of short routes and you can't specify progressions or pick plays. Only 15 VA points for +30% KL resistance and +30% CB < 8 yards is a no-brainer for me. It is even more helpful for TEs. I go with very pass heavy casual offenses and I would say that it is required for just about every kind of scheme or preset I have tried to run there. There are occasions where certain guys should not use it but they are rare in my experience.
Other people may be able to get away without but it seems like a bad idea
TE's it is a no brainer. But WR's....eh...just seems like there are better uses to me. I would like to see a study on the amount of passes people make to WR's under 8 yards in casual to make a decision.
Originally posted by bhall43
TE's it is a no brainer. But WR's....eh...just seems like there are better uses to me. I would like to see a study on the amount of passes people make to WR's under 8 yards in casual to make a decision.
I've run a few of these surveys on my teams in the past. Ill do another one later and report back
TE's it is a no brainer. But WR's....eh...just seems like there are better uses to me. I would like to see a study on the amount of passes people make to WR's under 8 yards in casual to make a decision.
I've run a few of these surveys on my teams in the past. Ill do another one later and report back
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
