it seems like it would be nice i am not sure if this falls under never going to happen list i read it
oh sorry meant STOP
oh sorry meant STOP
Edited by empty3 on Nov 11, 2013 19:27:13
Edited by empty3 on Oct 28, 2013 16:06:40
Forum > Suggestions > special teams position instead of archtype
fogie55
offline
offline
-1
a) there are a range of different ht/wt choices that you can get by using different positions
b) questionable how you could then use the STOP as a backup on O or D when desired (you'd have to have two or more ATs within the ST position)
c) would probably end up costing more than 100 flex if there was such a thing and a lot of pure STOP builders use OLs to save flex
a) there are a range of different ht/wt choices that you can get by using different positions
b) questionable how you could then use the STOP as a backup on O or D when desired (you'd have to have two or more ATs within the ST position)
c) would probably end up costing more than 100 flex if there was such a thing and a lot of pure STOP builders use OLs to save flex
Edited by fogie55 on Oct 28, 2013 20:19:40
This already exists in a way. The "Combo" archetypes are the best for this effect. You still have a decent dot that can play it's "normal" position, and can be also built to be great ST players.
-1
-1
empty3
offline
offline
Originally posted by fogie55
-1
a) there are a range of different ht/wt choices that you can get by using different positions
b) questionable how you could then use the STOP as a backup on O or D when desired (you'd have to have two or more ATs within the ST position)
c) would probably end up costing more than 100 flex if there was such a thing and a lot of pure STOP builders use OLs to save flex
stop would seem like a non glammer position to me and the arch types would be one is made more for blocking and other is made more for tackling
-1
a) there are a range of different ht/wt choices that you can get by using different positions
b) questionable how you could then use the STOP as a backup on O or D when desired (you'd have to have two or more ATs within the ST position)
c) would probably end up costing more than 100 flex if there was such a thing and a lot of pure STOP builders use OLs to save flex
stop would seem like a non glammer position to me and the arch types would be one is made more for blocking and other is made more for tackling
Edited by empty3 on Nov 11, 2013 19:16:11
Edited by empty3 on Nov 11, 2013 19:14:28
Edited by empty3 on Oct 29, 2013 16:18:29
Edited by empty3 on Oct 29, 2013 15:26:39
Guppy, Inc
online
online
-1
its more fun and realistic to have to figure out how to use regular players than to have a whole team full of stops.
its more fun and realistic to have to figure out how to use regular players than to have a whole team full of stops.
empty3
offline
offline
Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
-1
its more fun and realistic to have to figure out how to use regular players than to have a whole team full of stops.
when did i say increase the player limit?
-1
its more fun and realistic to have to figure out how to use regular players than to have a whole team full of stops.
when did i say increase the player limit?
Guppy, Inc
online
online
Originally posted by empty3
when did i say increase the player limit?
whee did i say that you said to increase the limit? a full team of stops refers to teams that sign 10 stops.
when did i say increase the player limit?
whee did i say that you said to increase the limit? a full team of stops refers to teams that sign 10 stops.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
