User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > FAQ's, Player Guides and Newbie Help > What determines the "All time x Rank" under Player Awards
Page:
 
Link
 
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
You made the thread and the OP was a whine about the system not working. Try being a little bit more of a hypocrite.


You couldn't be more wrong. I was asking how the ranking system is decided, and then stated that I knew it was broken.

very different than whining because my shit returner is gaming the system and not winning MVP.
it's a friggin .gif, get over it.
 
Link
 
Dustin, I shouldn't have to remind you that IF you'd like the topic of how the HOF works and doesn't work to remain open that its in your best interest not to get in a pissing match within the thread.
 
Longhornfan1024
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Dustin.
You couldn't be more wrong. I was asking how the ranking system is decided, and then stated that I knew it was broken.

very different than whining because my shit returner is gaming the system and not winning MVP.
it's a friggin .gif, get over it.


When your final statement is that you don't know how the system works, you just know it's not broken, you are whining and it is a whine thread. You are simply being a hypocrite here because you don't like me when in reality you should be supporting me if you think the system is broken as I've been the biggest advocate for fixing both the HOF system and the MVP system. If you could look at what I'm doing beyond face-value you'd see that is the case. At least Larry is intelligent enough to see what I'm doing for what it actually is.
 
TrevJo
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Dustin.
I was looking through some of my dots checking out award and such, and noticed my Kicker is ranked "9th Global K/P Rank" (Under Current Season)

How are these listings decided?
I'm not actually sure how the HOF works, all I know is that it's broken.


FWIW I didn't take this as whining. I took it as an acknowledgement of a common opinion amongst the userbase, and perhaps a pre-emptive strike against a responder being the one to bring up that take.
Edited by TrevJo on Aug 21, 2013 10:02:10
 
Link
 
Originally posted by TrevJo
FWIW I didn't take this as whining. I took it as an acknowledgement of a common opinion amongst the userbase, and perhaps a pre-emptive strike against a responder being the one to bring up that take.


Yeah, I was simply re-iterating what I've seen around GLB and inquiring about how it works and why everyone says it's broken.

Thanks to those who provided good information!
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.