Remove the dropped passes leaderboard and replace with receptions.
Edited by Newfan on Jul 27, 2013 07:41:29
Forum > Suggestions > Stat suggestion
ChildishGambino
offline
offline
-1
Every other position highlights a negative stat. Why should WRs be any different?
Every other position highlights a negative stat. Why should WRs be any different?
MileHighShoes
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dustin.
-1
Every other position highlights a negative stat. Why should WRs be any different?
Ok, well it'd be nice if they added receptions, or better yet a receptions per target ratio with a rolling nmber of minimum targets required per week to be counted... so say it requires at least 2-3 targets per week to be included, so you could see who the most efficient receivers were and who was getting the most catches overall.
Kind of like how defense has 6 Stats, would be cool if receiving had more.
-1
Every other position highlights a negative stat. Why should WRs be any different?
Ok, well it'd be nice if they added receptions, or better yet a receptions per target ratio with a rolling nmber of minimum targets required per week to be counted... so say it requires at least 2-3 targets per week to be included, so you could see who the most efficient receivers were and who was getting the most catches overall.
Kind of like how defense has 6 Stats, would be cool if receiving had more.
Staz
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dustin.
-1
Every other position highlights a negative stat. Why should WRs be any different?
I'd be in favor of changing INTs to Completions, Fumbles to Carries, and Drops to Receptions.
-1
Every other position highlights a negative stat. Why should WRs be any different?
I'd be in favor of changing INTs to Completions, Fumbles to Carries, and Drops to Receptions.
I'd like to see much more percentage based stats (how about catching % for receivers based off of passes caught and passes dropped)... stuff like that.
And now we cue the Rolling Stones...
"You can't always get what you want.... no, you can't always get what you want... "
And now we cue the Rolling Stones...
"You can't always get what you want.... no, you can't always get what you want... "
fogie55
offline
offline
Originally posted by Staz
I'd be in favor of changing INTs to Completions, Fumbles to Carries, and Drops to Receptions.
I'd be in favor of changing INTs to Completions, Fumbles to Carries, and Drops to Receptions.
ChildishGambino
offline
offline
Originally posted by MileHighShoes
Ok, well it'd be nice if they added receptions, or better yet a receptions per target ratio with a rolling nmber of minimum targets required per week to be counted... so say it requires at least 2-3 targets per week to be included, so you could see who the most efficient receivers were and who was getting the most catches overall.
Kind of like how defense has 6 Stats, would be cool if receiving had more.
That would be cool.
Ok, well it'd be nice if they added receptions, or better yet a receptions per target ratio with a rolling nmber of minimum targets required per week to be counted... so say it requires at least 2-3 targets per week to be included, so you could see who the most efficient receivers were and who was getting the most catches overall.
Kind of like how defense has 6 Stats, would be cool if receiving had more.
That would be cool.
Originally posted by Staz
I'd be in favor of changing INTs to Completions, Fumbles to Carries, and Drops to Receptions.
Why change them? I say just add them. Regarding stats, the more the better, imo.
I'd be in favor of changing INTs to Completions, Fumbles to Carries, and Drops to Receptions.
Why change them? I say just add them. Regarding stats, the more the better, imo.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
