GLB really needs to look at taking out Trips in casual. The play is almost impossible to stop with a team purely build around rushing the QB. Manchester United is one of the top teams in Casual but only cause of the trips play.. Please GLB take out that play in casual. Please.
Forum > Suggestions > Casual Rushing QB's...
I think you are trying to blame everything on 1 play that your team didn't defend well and got burnt on. instead of looking at other aspects of your championship game that also had bearing on your team getting beaten.
1.) your team level is 68 with a E-level of 73 with a team effective level of 1095.12. Manchester United level 68 with a E-level 79 and a team effective level of 1209.94. now that doesn't mean alot except that Manchester builds their dots more effectively. which would lead me to believe they have a better built team overall. especially with the RQB's on the roster which in alot of cases lowers the team effective level score.
No offense is meant at all by me but I understand where you are coming from it is a pain in the ass to get beaten in a championship game. but most teams that I have had in casual have been able to defend against RQB's in general. and have been able to limit most RQB rushes to acceptable gains. maybe your DC missed a setting or something. it could be you have the wrong type of players trying to defend in that one situation. it could be a multitude of different things. but in all honesty if the play you want taken out wasn't used by Manchester I would still bet that they beat your team. that is why I don't see the play being the problem.
1.) your team level is 68 with a E-level of 73 with a team effective level of 1095.12. Manchester United level 68 with a E-level 79 and a team effective level of 1209.94. now that doesn't mean alot except that Manchester builds their dots more effectively. which would lead me to believe they have a better built team overall. especially with the RQB's on the roster which in alot of cases lowers the team effective level score.
No offense is meant at all by me but I understand where you are coming from it is a pain in the ass to get beaten in a championship game. but most teams that I have had in casual have been able to defend against RQB's in general. and have been able to limit most RQB rushes to acceptable gains. maybe your DC missed a setting or something. it could be you have the wrong type of players trying to defend in that one situation. it could be a multitude of different things. but in all honesty if the play you want taken out wasn't used by Manchester I would still bet that they beat your team. that is why I don't see the play being the problem.
Unspoken
offline
offline
Originally posted by hatchman
I think you are trying to blame everything on 1 play that your team didn't defend well and got burnt on. instead of looking at other aspects of your championship game that also had bearing on your team getting beaten.
1.) your team level is 68 with a E-level of 73 with a team effective level of 1095.12. Manchester United level 68 with a E-level 79 and a team effective level of 1209.94. now that doesn't mean alot except that Manchester builds their dots more effectively. which would lead me to believe they have a better built team overall. especially with the RQB's on the roster which in alot of cases lowers the team effective level score.
No offense is meant at all by me but I understand where you are coming from it is a pain in the ass to get beaten in a championship game. but most teams that I have had in casual have been able to defend against RQB's in general. and have been able to limit most RQB rushes to acceptable gains. maybe your DC missed a setting or something. it could be you have the wrong type of players trying to defend in that one situation. it could be a multitude of different things. but in all honesty if the play you want taken out wasn't used by Manchester I would still bet that they beat your team. that is why I don't see the play being the problem.
Nope nothing to do with being sad about losing a game. I pretty much knew we where going to lose. I specifically tried to gear my whole D to stop the Trips and leave everything else open and yeap we still lost bad. If I did not protect against the trips then we would have lost bad. Thanks for not answering my question at all though. Wow. Won enough Gold not to be mad about losing in the big game.
I think you are trying to blame everything on 1 play that your team didn't defend well and got burnt on. instead of looking at other aspects of your championship game that also had bearing on your team getting beaten.
1.) your team level is 68 with a E-level of 73 with a team effective level of 1095.12. Manchester United level 68 with a E-level 79 and a team effective level of 1209.94. now that doesn't mean alot except that Manchester builds their dots more effectively. which would lead me to believe they have a better built team overall. especially with the RQB's on the roster which in alot of cases lowers the team effective level score.
No offense is meant at all by me but I understand where you are coming from it is a pain in the ass to get beaten in a championship game. but most teams that I have had in casual have been able to defend against RQB's in general. and have been able to limit most RQB rushes to acceptable gains. maybe your DC missed a setting or something. it could be you have the wrong type of players trying to defend in that one situation. it could be a multitude of different things. but in all honesty if the play you want taken out wasn't used by Manchester I would still bet that they beat your team. that is why I don't see the play being the problem.
Nope nothing to do with being sad about losing a game. I pretty much knew we where going to lose. I specifically tried to gear my whole D to stop the Trips and leave everything else open and yeap we still lost bad. If I did not protect against the trips then we would have lost bad. Thanks for not answering my question at all though. Wow. Won enough Gold not to be mad about losing in the big game.
Nokturnus
offline
offline
I think taking anything away from casual is a bad idea.
Here's a thought though as a casual DC. More options for defensive coordinating.
Offensive Coordinating you can choose the frequency of packages being used thus being able to use an exploit (if there are any) simply because DCs in casual cannot do the same.
If I want to run a nickel or dime defense all game, I should be able to. Or if I never want to change out of 4-3 or 3-4 regardless of what the offense lines up in I should be able to.
-1 for taking away from Casual.
+1 for Offensive/ Defensive balance.
Here's a thought though as a casual DC. More options for defensive coordinating.
Offensive Coordinating you can choose the frequency of packages being used thus being able to use an exploit (if there are any) simply because DCs in casual cannot do the same.
If I want to run a nickel or dime defense all game, I should be able to. Or if I never want to change out of 4-3 or 3-4 regardless of what the offense lines up in I should be able to.
-1 for taking away from Casual.
+1 for Offensive/ Defensive balance.
Unspoken
offline
offline
Originally posted by Nokturnus
I think taking anything away from casual is a bad idea.
Here's a thought though as a casual DC. More options for defensive coordinating.
Offensive Coordinating you can choose the frequency of packages being used thus being able to use an exploit (if there are any) simply because DCs in casual cannot do the same.
If I want to run a nickel or dime defense all game, I should be able to. Or if I never want to change out of 4-3 or 3-4 regardless of what the offense lines up in I should be able to.
-1 for taking away from Casual.
+1 for Offensive/ Defensive balance.
That would do. Great suggestion Nokturnus.
I think taking anything away from casual is a bad idea.
Here's a thought though as a casual DC. More options for defensive coordinating.
Offensive Coordinating you can choose the frequency of packages being used thus being able to use an exploit (if there are any) simply because DCs in casual cannot do the same.
If I want to run a nickel or dime defense all game, I should be able to. Or if I never want to change out of 4-3 or 3-4 regardless of what the offense lines up in I should be able to.
-1 for taking away from Casual.
+1 for Offensive/ Defensive balance.
That would do. Great suggestion Nokturnus.
Dub J
offline
offline
Wasn't the DPC added because rushing QBs + PBs were overpowered in the regular leagues?
Originally posted by Unspoken
Originally posted by hatchman
I think you are trying to blame everything on 1 play that your team didn't defend well and got burnt on. instead of looking at other aspects of your championship game that also had bearing on your team getting beaten.
1.) your team level is 68 with a E-level of 73 with a team effective level of 1095.12. Manchester United level 68 with a E-level 79 and a team effective level of 1209.94. now that doesn't mean alot except that Manchester builds their dots more effectively. which would lead me to believe they have a better built team overall. especially with the RQB's on the roster which in alot of cases lowers the team effective level score.
No offense is meant at all by me but I understand where you are coming from it is a pain in the ass to get beaten in a championship game. but most teams that I have had in casual have been able to defend against RQB's in general. and have been able to limit most RQB rushes to acceptable gains. maybe your DC missed a setting or something. it could be you have the wrong type of players trying to defend in that one situation. it could be a multitude of different things. but in all honesty if the play you want taken out wasn't used by Manchester I would still bet that they beat your team. that is why I don't see the play being the problem.
Nope nothing to do with being sad about losing a game. I pretty much knew we where going to lose. I specifically tried to gear my whole D to stop the Trips and leave everything else open and yeap we still lost bad. If I did not protect against the trips then we would have lost bad. Thanks for not answering my question at all though. Wow. Won enough Gold not to be mad about losing in the big game.
How did I not answer your question? I tried to nicely say that your team would have been beaten in that game regardless of whether the other team used the play you are wanting removed or not. I also do not see where I said anything about you being sad about losing the game. I simply tried showing you different things that could be the problem instead of just the 1 play you are referring to.
Originally posted by hatchman
I think you are trying to blame everything on 1 play that your team didn't defend well and got burnt on. instead of looking at other aspects of your championship game that also had bearing on your team getting beaten.
1.) your team level is 68 with a E-level of 73 with a team effective level of 1095.12. Manchester United level 68 with a E-level 79 and a team effective level of 1209.94. now that doesn't mean alot except that Manchester builds their dots more effectively. which would lead me to believe they have a better built team overall. especially with the RQB's on the roster which in alot of cases lowers the team effective level score.
No offense is meant at all by me but I understand where you are coming from it is a pain in the ass to get beaten in a championship game. but most teams that I have had in casual have been able to defend against RQB's in general. and have been able to limit most RQB rushes to acceptable gains. maybe your DC missed a setting or something. it could be you have the wrong type of players trying to defend in that one situation. it could be a multitude of different things. but in all honesty if the play you want taken out wasn't used by Manchester I would still bet that they beat your team. that is why I don't see the play being the problem.
Nope nothing to do with being sad about losing a game. I pretty much knew we where going to lose. I specifically tried to gear my whole D to stop the Trips and leave everything else open and yeap we still lost bad. If I did not protect against the trips then we would have lost bad. Thanks for not answering my question at all though. Wow. Won enough Gold not to be mad about losing in the big game.
How did I not answer your question? I tried to nicely say that your team would have been beaten in that game regardless of whether the other team used the play you are wanting removed or not. I also do not see where I said anything about you being sad about losing the game. I simply tried showing you different things that could be the problem instead of just the 1 play you are referring to.
Originally posted by Unspoken
Please GLB take out that play in casual. Please.
/thread
Please GLB take out that play in casual. Please.
/thread
backstop
offline
offline
Originally posted by Nokturnus
I think taking anything away from casual is a bad idea.
Here's a thought though as a casual DC. More options for defensive coordinating.
Offensive Coordinating you can choose the frequency of packages being used thus being able to use an exploit (if there are any) simply because DCs in casual cannot do the same.
If I want to run a nickel or dime defense all game, I should be able to. Or if I never want to change out of 4-3 or 3-4 regardless of what the offense lines up in I should be able to.
-1 for taking away from Casual.
+1 for Offensive/ Defensive balance.
+1 Needed!
I think taking anything away from casual is a bad idea.
Here's a thought though as a casual DC. More options for defensive coordinating.
Offensive Coordinating you can choose the frequency of packages being used thus being able to use an exploit (if there are any) simply because DCs in casual cannot do the same.
If I want to run a nickel or dime defense all game, I should be able to. Or if I never want to change out of 4-3 or 3-4 regardless of what the offense lines up in I should be able to.
-1 for taking away from Casual.
+1 for Offensive/ Defensive balance.
+1 Needed!
Unspoken
offline
offline
Originally posted by hatchman
Originally posted by Unspoken
Originally posted by hatchman
I think you are trying to blame everything on 1 play that your team didn't defend well and got burnt on. instead of looking at other aspects of your championship game that also had bearing on your team getting beaten.
1.) your team level is 68 with a E-level of 73 with a team effective level of 1095.12. Manchester United level 68 with a E-level 79 and a team effective level of 1209.94. now that doesn't mean alot except that Manchester builds their dots more effectively. which would lead me to believe they have a better built team overall. especially with the RQB's on the roster which in alot of cases lowers the team effective level score.
No offense is meant at all by me but I understand where you are coming from it is a pain in the ass to get beaten in a championship game. but most teams that I have had in casual have been able to defend against RQB's in general. and have been able to limit most RQB rushes to acceptable gains. maybe your DC missed a setting or something. it could be you have the wrong type of players trying to defend in that one situation. it could be a multitude of different things. but in all honesty if the play you want taken out wasn't used by Manchester I would still bet that they beat your team. that is why I don't see the play being the problem.
Nope nothing to do with being sad about losing a game. I pretty much knew we where going to lose. I specifically tried to gear my whole D to stop the Trips and leave everything else open and yeap we still lost bad. If I did not protect against the trips then we would have lost bad. Thanks for not answering my question at all though. Wow. Won enough Gold not to be mad about losing in the big game.
How did I not answer your question? I tried to nicely say that your team would have been beaten in that game regardless of whether the other team used the play you are wanting removed or not. I also do not see where I said anything about you being sad about losing the game. I simply tried showing you different things that could be the problem instead of just the 1 play you are referring to.
Do a scouting report on Man U.. You will see its one formation that they use 90% of the time.
Originally posted by Unspoken
Originally posted by hatchman
I think you are trying to blame everything on 1 play that your team didn't defend well and got burnt on. instead of looking at other aspects of your championship game that also had bearing on your team getting beaten.
1.) your team level is 68 with a E-level of 73 with a team effective level of 1095.12. Manchester United level 68 with a E-level 79 and a team effective level of 1209.94. now that doesn't mean alot except that Manchester builds their dots more effectively. which would lead me to believe they have a better built team overall. especially with the RQB's on the roster which in alot of cases lowers the team effective level score.
No offense is meant at all by me but I understand where you are coming from it is a pain in the ass to get beaten in a championship game. but most teams that I have had in casual have been able to defend against RQB's in general. and have been able to limit most RQB rushes to acceptable gains. maybe your DC missed a setting or something. it could be you have the wrong type of players trying to defend in that one situation. it could be a multitude of different things. but in all honesty if the play you want taken out wasn't used by Manchester I would still bet that they beat your team. that is why I don't see the play being the problem.
Nope nothing to do with being sad about losing a game. I pretty much knew we where going to lose. I specifically tried to gear my whole D to stop the Trips and leave everything else open and yeap we still lost bad. If I did not protect against the trips then we would have lost bad. Thanks for not answering my question at all though. Wow. Won enough Gold not to be mad about losing in the big game.
How did I not answer your question? I tried to nicely say that your team would have been beaten in that game regardless of whether the other team used the play you are wanting removed or not. I also do not see where I said anything about you being sad about losing the game. I simply tried showing you different things that could be the problem instead of just the 1 play you are referring to.
Do a scouting report on Man U.. You will see its one formation that they use 90% of the time.
Timetoshine-Metta
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dub J
Wasn't the DPC added because rushing QBs + PBs were overpowered in the regular leagues?
make casual more like regular leagues
Wasn't the DPC added because rushing QBs + PBs were overpowered in the regular leagues?
make casual more like regular leagues
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
