I go with Agility first on my pass blocking Archetypes. I put all EQ on Strength though.
Forum > FAQ's, Player Guides and Newbie Help > What's the best way to go about building o-linemen?
Novus
offline
offline
Originally posted by Bane
If it is not a major then it is not the attribute you should start with, no matter how bad you need it
This. This this this this this.
If it is not a major then it is not the attribute you should start with, no matter how bad you need it
This. This this this this this.
Novus
offline
offline
Originally posted by Phantom Of The Opera
I go with Agility first on my pass blocking Archetypes. I put all EQ on Strength though.
Under-rated technique, IMO. Good way to maximize training on a major attribute while still getting a much-needed boost on an important Attribute that happens to be a minor.
I go with Agility first on my pass blocking Archetypes. I put all EQ on Strength though.
Under-rated technique, IMO. Good way to maximize training on a major attribute while still getting a much-needed boost on an important Attribute that happens to be a minor.
Novus
offline
offline
Originally posted by XtremeT13
Does cut block work for other positions? Blocking TE, WR's or just the Center?
Works for all positions, as far as I know.
Does cut block work for other positions? Blocking TE, WR's or just the Center?
Works for all positions, as far as I know.
Originally posted by Novus
Originally posted by Phantom Of The Opera
I go with Agility first on my pass blocking Archetypes. I put all EQ on Strength though.
Under-rated technique, IMO. Good way to maximize training on a major attribute while still getting a much-needed boost on an important Attribute that happens to be a minor.
actually I thought this was widely known
Originally posted by Phantom Of The Opera
I go with Agility first on my pass blocking Archetypes. I put all EQ on Strength though.
Under-rated technique, IMO. Good way to maximize training on a major attribute while still getting a much-needed boost on an important Attribute that happens to be a minor.
actually I thought this was widely known
Novus
offline
offline
Originally posted by reddogrw
actually I thought this was widely known
I only recently learned of it myself, and a couple of guys on my current team learned it at the same time I did.
One of the biggest things I've learned from my time on GLB is this: NEVER assume something is widely-known.
actually I thought this was widely known
I only recently learned of it myself, and a couple of guys on my current team learned it at the same time I did.
One of the biggest things I've learned from my time on GLB is this: NEVER assume something is widely-known.
Originally posted by Novus
Originally posted by reddogrw
actually I thought this was widely known
I only recently learned of it myself, and a couple of guys on my current team learned it at the same time I did.
One of the biggest things I've learned from my time on GLB is this: NEVER assume something is widely-known.
I meant widely known amongst the, well never mind
Originally posted by reddogrw
actually I thought this was widely known
I only recently learned of it myself, and a couple of guys on my current team learned it at the same time I did.
One of the biggest things I've learned from my time on GLB is this: NEVER assume something is widely-known.
I meant widely known amongst the, well never mind
Novus
offline
offline
Originally posted by reddogrw
I meant widely known amongst the, well never mind
Widely known amongst build gurus? Of which I am not a member?
I meant widely known amongst the, well never mind
Widely known amongst build gurus? Of which I am not a member?
Originally posted by Bane
If it is not a major then it is not the attribute you should start with, no matter how bad you need it
If it is not a major then it is not the attribute you should start with, no matter how bad you need it
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
