Warrior General Games

Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
I'm surprised this wasn't picked up earlier given how long we've had those stacking limitations. Something tells me it couldn't have been wrong from the beginning, lol.

a lot of people didn't bother stacking 4 tbh

Originally posted by Homage
Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust

I'm surprised this wasn't picked up earlier given how long we've had those stacking limitations. Something tells me it couldn't have been wrong from the beginning, lol.

a lot of people didn't bother stacking 4 tbh

ya, generally makes zero sense to do it, but there's always an idiot willing to try things.

If you could have swapped out one of those pd% for another pq%, we could have seen if the 5th piece adds 1/8th or 1/16th.
so your equation would be 2n-1 or (n-1)^2

I have marked the bug report as a bug. I don't have access to the test server, but I assume this would be pretty easy to confirm there (including the 5th piece). If not, it should be very easy for Bort to look at.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/faq.pl?cat=Player%20Equipment#178

they should leave the 4th as is, but make the 5th worth 2X more than the 1st to make up for it

At this point its up to Bort on whether to fix this or leave it as is. The difference between 1/6 and 1/8 is minimal and will probably rarely ever be used. Those that do, however, should know that their 4th piece of AEQ may be nerfed at some point in the future. Hopefully not a build killer though.

Originally posted by AirMcMVP
At this point its up to Bort on whether to fix this or leave it as is. The difference between 1/6 and 1/8 is minimal and will probably rarely ever be used. Those that do, however, should know that their 4th piece of AEQ may be nerfed at some point in the future. Hopefully not a build killer though.

uh LOL, I'm glad you think that's true, but if I know I can get a ridiculous bump on the 4th piece, I'm going to use it now.

Originally posted by Homage
uh LOL, I'm glad you think that's true, but if I know I can get a ridiculous bump on the 4th piece, I'm going to use it now.

2.5% is a "ridiculous bump" compared to 1.875%? We're talking about .625% here. That's hardly a significant gain.

Originally posted by AirMcMVP
2.5% is a "ridiculous bump" compared to 1.875%? We're talking about .625% here. That's hardly a significant gain.

People were saying the same thing about a 3rd piece back when this was first introduced and not a lot of people roll with 3 in PQ%. When the difference between the 3rd and 4th piece is marginal, it makes sense to do it. And if you consider that the 4th piece could be a 15% piece instead of a 12% it can be very different.

28.75% on a QB not even including promotions is just LOL

if they change the rules, so be it... but I'd like some clarification on whether it's a display error or a sim error. That's an important part.

Since this is GLB afterall, did you try to unequip and re-equip all the pieces to see if that fixes it? Probably not the case, but it does fix issues with endorsement %'s hanging around after the fact so worth a shot.

Originally posted by Homage
People were saying the same thing about a 3rd piece back when this was first introduced and not a lot of people roll with 3 in PQ%. When the difference between the 3rd and 4th piece is marginal, it makes sense to do it. And if you consider that the 4th piece could be a 15% piece instead of a 12% it can be very different.

28.75% on a QB not even including promotions is just LOL


Yeah, but the opportunity cost on that last piece is really high. The only reason I did it with that QB is because I rolled a +3 Throwing/5% piece as his 4th piece in the store and I said what the hell, might as well go for it. If I'd been presented with the option for another +3 Throwing with 5% Pas Distance, Fake Chance, or a useful SA, I would have chosen that instead.

a .5% difference just doesn't move the bar much at all.

Originally posted by Farlig
Since this is GLB afterall, did you try to unequip and re-equip all the pieces to see if that fixes it? Probably not the case, but it does fix issues with endorsement %'s hanging around after the fact so worth a shot.

Yes, tried this, doesn't matter.