Warrior General Games

Originally posted by alindyl
the last line is not really correct and it's deceptive. According to that you can eventually lose more money than you pay to get the flex unless you do nothing but buy 250 flex pop warner packs.

There is no way to assign a specific value to the flex "lost" without knowing the initial price paid to get the flex. Each time you buy a larger amount of flex you get a better discount.

I think that was done assuming that flex used paid for at full price

Originally posted by Team Nucleus
From experience, its fun to play GLB as a booster and as a non-booster

Boosters http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=5015537

Non-Boosters http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=4627039&page=26#46641174

OP

If you have to ask, you can't afford it.

Originally posted by Time Trial
OP

If you have to ask, you can't afford it.

Not true at all
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWFV7g0vO64&feature=share&list=PL96F3821C98349D8C

Originally posted by Vic Koenning
The killer in doing no/no teams would be the team ownership costs. Anyone want to run a no/no team, I'll make all the players

16 regular scrims x 25 flexies = 400 flex per season + team ownership x 400 flexies

Plus if you want to be at least semi-competitive, figure a handful of instant scrims to sort out that season's changes, call it 200.

So about 1000 flex per season as an owner. (none of it refunded)

Not too terrifying, and probably the only reason Bort + co. haven't come down harder on the no/no crowd. It's still keeping some people interested who can't afford the eye popping price of the booster side. And the owners in total, looking at the sizes of the various no/no leagues are pumping in about 60,000 flex at 0% return in every season.

i think TIME, not MONEY, is the barrier to most people trying to build a full 55-man boosted team on their own.

If GLB is still around when I retire I'd get a couple Hall of Fame packs and give it a go.