User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Suggestions > Input option for # of TE's
Pwned
offline
Link
 
On the Defensive AI's.

Allow us to select a # of TE's as well as the # of WR's to differentiate all of the 2 WR sets from Singleback Big formation. Would also allow us to use the 2 TE's as a way to differentiate the two big formations from the rest as well.

+1
 
Dub J
offline
Link
 
lol
 
KingPB
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Pwned
On the Defensive AI's.

Allow us to select a # of TE's as well as the # of WR's to differentiate all of the 2 WR sets from Singleback Big formation. Would also allow us to use the 2 TE's as a way to differentiate the two big formations from the rest as well.

+1


dude just create the defensive play to trigger for the formation you want in your DAI
 
SG✬21
offline
Link
 
this would be a simple addition but at the same time are you too lazy to make a few inputs for SB Big that are above the 2 WR formation inputs?
 
KingPB
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by SG✬21
this would be a simple addition but at the same time are you too lazy to make a few inputs for SB Big that are above the 2 WR formation inputs?


Just create custom plays for each formation
 
SG✬21
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by pbmark50
Just create custom plays for each formation


are you telling me to do that?
 
KingPB
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by SG✬21
are you telling me to do that?


lol no, I was more agreeing with you. Sorry, came off weird the way I posted it
 
SG✬21
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by pbmark50
lol no, I was more agreeing with you. Sorry, came off weird the way I posted it


ok good cause i didn't know who it was directed at
 
Pwned
offline
Link
 
I'd rather be able to generalize it.

Thanks though.
 
Dub J
offline
Link
 
If a team passes at all to their backs you're going to get fucked. There are plays with Pro and SI that you can't cover with the same custom plays you would the I, SB Big, and Weak.
 
KingPB
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Pwned
I'd rather be able to generalize it.

Thanks though.


Id rather it be more difficult.

-1
 
FuzzyP
offline
Link
 
+1
 
Gambler75
online
Link
 
You already can cover this under the current system (more accurately).
I'd much rather see them spend development time elsewhere.

-1
 
Primate
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by SG✬21
are you telling me to do that?


Yes! Do it now!
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.