Warrior General Games

http://i.imgur.com/3IkJb.png

From http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2109625

How is this possible?

if he is ever in a zone, and a player catches the ball in his zone it counts as rec allowed.. Targets only occur when he is covering someone i believe

I don't think I've seen that one before. I didn't realize it was possible to be assigned a reception allowed without also being assigned a target for that play.

Originally posted by jdbolick
I don't think I've seen that one before. I didn't realize it was possible to be assigned a reception allowed without also being assigned a target for that play.

They are completely separate stats, so it's always been possible. Something did change last off-season though, because stuff like this is happening constantly now. Look at ANY game, add together both the targets and rec allowed and compare it to the opponent QB stat sheet. Usually there's 5 more rec's allowed than completions, and also more targets than attempts.

I noticed in those stats he had an Interception.......think that counted as the 5th reception allowed?

No ive seen this. Forgot what dot, but someone on FA thread the other day I looked at and he had like 10 more rec allowed than targets.

Originally posted by coreyls18
No ive seen this. Forgot what dot, but someone on FA thread the other day I looked at and he had like 10 more rec allowed than targets.

Did he have a bunch of INT's? Just wondering if there is a glitch in Bort's coding that considers an INT a "catch allowed" LOL

Originally posted by whodey08
Did he have a bunch of INT's? Just wondering if there is a glitch in Bort's coding that considers an INT a "catch allowed" LOL

it's not the INTs ... http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2109899

SS had 3 INT, 1 target, 0 receptions allowed. Would've shown up 3 R.A. if that were the case.

I did notice that the MLB I had playing underneath zones a lot, got hammered on the Targ/Alw ratio over the length of the season, I believe it's as SG✬21 posted above.