Originally posted by Thundercat_12
-1 another horrible idea by yellow
-1 another horrible idea by yellow
Forum > Suggestions > Scale Veteran Points Accrual to the Number of Abilities Applicable to that Position
Guppy, Inc
online
online
i'm surprised that he didnt just suggest giving everyone enough VA pts to buy every VA as soon as they hit level 25.
Originally posted by foshizzel17
wtf is this?
Originally posted by Thundercat_12
another horrible idea by yellow
wtf is this?
Originally posted by Thundercat_12
another horrible idea by yellow
Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
i'm surprised that he didnt just suggest giving everyone enough VA pts to buy every VA as soon as they hit level 25.
I sense a general "tldr" in the responses here.
As I said the exact number of VPs is not the point, its scaling it to the number of VAs that the position can use.
You could make it 33% of the total and give LESS VPs to most positions (ie 45 to Pass Blocking Linemen) if thats considered better.
i'm surprised that he didnt just suggest giving everyone enough VA pts to buy every VA as soon as they hit level 25.
I sense a general "tldr" in the responses here.
As I said the exact number of VPs is not the point, its scaling it to the number of VAs that the position can use.
You could make it 33% of the total and give LESS VPs to most positions (ie 45 to Pass Blocking Linemen) if thats considered better.
merenoise
offline
offline
Originally posted by yello1
I sense a general "tldr" in the responses here.
Funny, I just see a lot of "wow that is a bad idea" responses.
I sense a general "tldr" in the responses here.
Funny, I just see a lot of "wow that is a bad idea" responses.
Originally posted by merenoise
Funny, I just see a lot of "wow that is a bad idea" responses.
Yeah but everyone is entitled to their opinion.
I was addressing the ones that seem focused on it adding more VPs rather than the scaling.
Funny, I just see a lot of "wow that is a bad idea" responses.
Yeah but everyone is entitled to their opinion.
I was addressing the ones that seem focused on it adding more VPs rather than the scaling.
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Just stop.
he can't no matter how bad the idea he will argue it to no end. he probably thinks this will make his less than stellar builds equal to the top knotch dot builders in someway.
Just stop.
he can't no matter how bad the idea he will argue it to no end. he probably thinks this will make his less than stellar builds equal to the top knotch dot builders in someway.
Originally posted by hatchman
he can't no matter how bad the idea he will argue it to no end. he probably thinks this will make his less than stellar builds equal to the top knotch dot builders in someway.
I have it all figured out it will allow my team to beat world league clubs who would never use this combo I have planned out.
he can't no matter how bad the idea he will argue it to no end. he probably thinks this will make his less than stellar builds equal to the top knotch dot builders in someway.
I have it all figured out it will allow my team to beat world league clubs who would never use this combo I have planned out.
Guppy, Inc
online
online
the scaling is ridiculous because not every one would agree with your choices for necessary VAs. i used to make good run blocking guards and my 1st two VAs arent even listed. and no matter what list someone comes up with, there will be many people that dont do it that way. i dont think VAs are what causes cookie cutter builds. its the ALGs that force just about every one to have very similar base builds.
Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
the scaling is ridiculous because not every one would agree with your choices for necessary VAs. i used to make good run blocking guards and my 1st two VAs arent even listed. and no matter what list someone comes up with, there will be many people that dont do it that way. i dont think VAs are what causes cookie cutter builds. its the ALGs that force just about every one to have very similar base builds.
Well like I said the actual VAs would be a matter of debate and eventual Bort choice. And yes it would likely be highly debated.
And its not like you could not use your VAs anyway. The idea is just to not make it so that every single O line man has the same VAs because he always has enough for all of them - OR if the does then there are some extra ones he can get that are varied for the same reason.
As for the ALG issue, yes this is not the only cause of cookie cutterism. But its one and we can only solve one issue per suggestion usually.
And I have no idea what to do about ALGs.
the scaling is ridiculous because not every one would agree with your choices for necessary VAs. i used to make good run blocking guards and my 1st two VAs arent even listed. and no matter what list someone comes up with, there will be many people that dont do it that way. i dont think VAs are what causes cookie cutter builds. its the ALGs that force just about every one to have very similar base builds.
Well like I said the actual VAs would be a matter of debate and eventual Bort choice. And yes it would likely be highly debated.
And its not like you could not use your VAs anyway. The idea is just to not make it so that every single O line man has the same VAs because he always has enough for all of them - OR if the does then there are some extra ones he can get that are varied for the same reason.
As for the ALG issue, yes this is not the only cause of cookie cutterism. But its one and we can only solve one issue per suggestion usually.
And I have no idea what to do about ALGs.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
