Originally posted by Ken1
Originally posted by hatchman
your not getting the idea at all from what I am gathering. basically it goes like this you own a team and you send me a contract offer for lets say 3 seasons at a really high salary. well I know I am not going to sign to your team long term because I do not know you and thus there is the trust issue. so I counter your offer and send a contract offer of 1 season for less salary. I also get to add why I do not accept long term contracts in the memo box.
the way things are now you have a drop down that gives you a few options and to actually let you know what type of contract I will accept I have to PM you. this cuts down on unneeded PMs and also makes it so that the owner can accept my counter offer as well as I can accept his initial or even a counter offer.
I'm not saying that your idea isn't an improvement over the system that I'm not sure is even working. It is an improvement, even if the system is working.
However, if it is working, you would reject the offer with "Contract length too long" as the reason.
Your idea would be an improvement on just that, because you could then propose a shorter contract but with a lower salary. That's an improvement. I'm not misunderstanding it. I'm for your idea. I'm just saying what's supposed to exist already.
I agree and the suggestion is just what you said a improvement to what is already in place. I just think that this suggestion would help the GLB community on different levels. 1.) It gives the agents of just a few players a little something to do with their players. so to them it adds a little chrome as Yello1 says. 2.) It cuts down on having to PM a bunch of owners if you are like myself and have a ton of Dots o deal with each season. 3.) It basically adds a little bit of added realism to the game. contract negotiations would go hand in hand with possibly implementing something in the future to make players cash useful for something.
Originally posted by hatchman
your not getting the idea at all from what I am gathering. basically it goes like this you own a team and you send me a contract offer for lets say 3 seasons at a really high salary. well I know I am not going to sign to your team long term because I do not know you and thus there is the trust issue. so I counter your offer and send a contract offer of 1 season for less salary. I also get to add why I do not accept long term contracts in the memo box.
the way things are now you have a drop down that gives you a few options and to actually let you know what type of contract I will accept I have to PM you. this cuts down on unneeded PMs and also makes it so that the owner can accept my counter offer as well as I can accept his initial or even a counter offer.
I'm not saying that your idea isn't an improvement over the system that I'm not sure is even working. It is an improvement, even if the system is working.
However, if it is working, you would reject the offer with "Contract length too long" as the reason.
Your idea would be an improvement on just that, because you could then propose a shorter contract but with a lower salary. That's an improvement. I'm not misunderstanding it. I'm for your idea. I'm just saying what's supposed to exist already.
I agree and the suggestion is just what you said a improvement to what is already in place. I just think that this suggestion would help the GLB community on different levels. 1.) It gives the agents of just a few players a little something to do with their players. so to them it adds a little chrome as Yello1 says. 2.) It cuts down on having to PM a bunch of owners if you are like myself and have a ton of Dots o deal with each season. 3.) It basically adds a little bit of added realism to the game. contract negotiations would go hand in hand with possibly implementing something in the future to make players cash useful for something.
