I like the thought of having good CPU teams. Make people game plan like a normal game and work for a win.
Forum > Suggestions > Tone down the CPU teams
Achelon
offline
offline
Originally posted by DiMo28
I like the thought of having good CPU teams. Make people game plan like a normal game and work for a win.
This, knowing you are going to win, makes the game pretty boring
I like the thought of having good CPU teams. Make people game plan like a normal game and work for a win.
This, knowing you are going to win, makes the game pretty boring
Originally posted by DiMo28
I like the thought of having good CPU teams. Make people game plan like a normal game and work for a win.
I agree.
I like the thought of having good CPU teams. Make people game plan like a normal game and work for a win.
I agree.
merenoise
offline
offline
Originally posted by spartan822
If anything, CPUs are too weak, not too strong.
This.
-1 to OP
If anything, CPUs are too weak, not too strong.
This.
-1 to OP
Originally posted by huskyfan10
You are missing the point, I would be willing to wager a guess that NEVER in GLB playoff history have Top 2 teams lost and to CPU teams.
CPU team won a Reg Pro Competitive league a season or two ago, prompting the nerf changes to CPU rosters recently made.
If that wasnt enough, then I agree
+1
You are missing the point, I would be willing to wager a guess that NEVER in GLB playoff history have Top 2 teams lost and to CPU teams.
CPU team won a Reg Pro Competitive league a season or two ago, prompting the nerf changes to CPU rosters recently made.
If that wasnt enough, then I agree
+1
Originally posted by Deathblade
this thread is bananas
Oh noes!!! Bananas are teh radioaktiv!!!
*runs in circles*
this thread is bananas
Oh noes!!! Bananas are teh radioaktiv!!!
*runs in circles*
Greywolfmeb
offline
offline
Originally posted by spartan822
If anything, CPUs are too weak, not too strong.
This
If anything, CPUs are too weak, not too strong.
This
Outlaw Dogs
offline
offline
Originally posted by yello1
Originally posted by huskyfan10
You are missing the point, I would be willing to wager a guess that NEVER in GLB playoff history have Top 2 teams lost and to CPU teams.
CPU team won a Reg Pro Competitive league a season or two ago, prompting the nerf changes to CPU rosters recently made.
If that wasnt enough, then I agree
+1
We should all get blue ribbons at the end of the season, hell why even keep score. You build a dot and Bort can throw you a fucking parade! We should never wonder or question how God-fucking awful the owners in a league that couldn't beat a CPU team were, we should just award rainbows and roses to everyone for simple participation.
Originally posted by huskyfan10
You are missing the point, I would be willing to wager a guess that NEVER in GLB playoff history have Top 2 teams lost and to CPU teams.
CPU team won a Reg Pro Competitive league a season or two ago, prompting the nerf changes to CPU rosters recently made.
If that wasnt enough, then I agree
+1
We should all get blue ribbons at the end of the season, hell why even keep score. You build a dot and Bort can throw you a fucking parade! We should never wonder or question how God-fucking awful the owners in a league that couldn't beat a CPU team were, we should just award rainbows and roses to everyone for simple participation.
Pwned
offline
offline
Originally posted by Outlaw Dogs
We should all get blue ribbons at the end of the season, hell why even keep score. You build a dot and Bort can throw you a fucking parade! We should never wonder or question how God-fucking awful the owners in a league that couldn't beat a CPU team were, we should just award rainbows and roses to everyone for simple participation.
I thought that was what Pee Wee was for?
We should all get blue ribbons at the end of the season, hell why even keep score. You build a dot and Bort can throw you a fucking parade! We should never wonder or question how God-fucking awful the owners in a league that couldn't beat a CPU team were, we should just award rainbows and roses to everyone for simple participation.
I thought that was what Pee Wee was for?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.






























