User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pacific Pro League > Oceania Conference > OPL forums were not so dead last time i was here.... WTH????
Page:
 
yello1
Preacher
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Jack Riley
I'll be busy this season working on my team.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=1094

Yep, that's right folks, you bet your ass they're back! And this time, when we hit Pro, we hope to make a statement.


Good to see.
 
Link
 
nice essays, but you'll lose points for being over the page limit.
 
beenlurken
offline
Link
 
Lol at thinking I blame glb problems on you!

Lol at you for looking at 100+ games as means to determine Nat pro competitiveness. Replacing gut jobs with "Oberon quality" (again plz don't take offense ruger) does not make the league more competitive. A leagues competitiveness is determined only by the amount of teams that actually have a shot at winning the league. Despite the bottom of Nat pro improving, the difference between the top two to three teams and the rest of the league has remained relatively unchanged. So while teams like Oberon don't blow anyone out like they used to they are still getting dominated by the best.. They still have no better of a chance at competing for a league title. Why should a team like Oberon care about having more close games when there are still 5-6 teams that destroy them without even trying? There is a reason why ruger wanted to move his team. He just wants his team to compete at a level where his team has a shot at a title... The only way this happens is if they contract Nat pro (as anyone with half a brain is for) and improve the regional pro format... Otherwise his team is forever stuck in a shitty boring situation.
 
yello1
Preacher
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by beenlurken
Lol at thinking I blame glb problems on you!

Lol at you for looking at 100+ games as means to determine Nat pro competitiveness. Replacing gut jobs with "Oberon quality" (again plz don't take offense ruger) does not make the league more competitive. A leagues competitiveness is determined only by the amount of teams that actually have a shot at winning the league. Despite the bottom of Nat pro improving, the difference between the top two to three teams and the rest of the league has remained relatively unchanged. So while teams like Oberon don't blow anyone out like they used to they are still getting dominated by the best.. They still have no better of a chance at competing for a league title. Why should a team like Oberon care about having more close games when there are still 5-6 teams that destroy them without even trying? There is a reason why ruger wanted to move his team. He just wants his team to compete at a level where his team has a shot at a title... The only way this happens is if they contract Nat pro (as anyone with half a brain is for) and improve the regional pro format... Otherwise his team is forever stuck in a shitty boring situation.


See here is where we are having a "failuuure to commuuunicate".

You keep talking about your pet horse of "how many people have a shot at the super bowl".

But thats never ever ever ever to the Nth been my point. Not once been my concern or complaint. The real NFL rarely has a large number of teams with real shots at a SBowl appearance in any given season. Its realistic for some teams to be really good and many pretty mediocre. You're arguing about that with me is like arguing the color of the sky when I am talking about my favorite band. It misses the point.

My problem has always been the range of outcomes in scores and stats that GLB allows, a range that is so far outside a normal football universe that it breaks the immersion interest in the game, makes it not a football sim but some bizarre game unrelated to the genre that we liked enough to make us click on the GLB page to begin with. And worse such results threaten to discourage players and make them take their digital balls and go home.

I will give this to you, I think I did say competitive in my troll post, and I should not have, as I am really talking about the illusion of competitiveness - the closeness of games that makes the games interesting. Keeps you on the edge of your seat thinking you can pull the game out up till the end of the game - whether or not you really can. Though of course if the score is close enough you COULD with a lucky play or two.

As for people not caring about it being close if they lose, well I suggest thats just not how humans really work. They may be very dissapointed with the loss, of course. But if they lose by 10 points they are going to think they can turn it around. If they lose by 50 or 100 week after week, they are going to think they should play World of Warcraft instead. Thats the difference and for a game that needs paying customers to exist thats a really big difference.

As for Oberon, Ruger has been here as long as I have, or more?, since S16. His disgust is neither yours or mine, but the long term WTF am I doing wrong variety bred from persistent failure. I can relate to that. But its not the variety or disgust that supports either of our positions I think.



 
beenlurken
offline
Link
 
Again the range (or however else you want to define it to deflect your ignorance) is unchanged.. the oberons of Nat pro continue to get destroyed by same point differentials.. the only thing that has changed is that Nat pro has had several waves of old rebuild teams (teams that restarted with new building process and/or archetypes) finally reach end game and pushed a lot of the guts out of Nat Pro. It has nothing to do with anything Bort has done.. well unless you consider his buff to CPU dots.

So while that may be good for the delusional few like yourself who are happy about more close games it does not change the fact that those teams still have no chance at a title. The overwhelming majority who play this game want a shot at the title and that just isn't happening.

Again look at Ruger/Oberon, he could give a shit about more close games... he just wants to be in a situation where he has a shot at a title.. he has made that very clear. It is very relevant to the reality of what most want out of this game and your delusions of what it should be.
 
Link
 
tl;dr
Edited by The Big Cack Envy on Dec 18, 2011 13:39:09
 
Ruger7mmmag
offline
Link
 
And yet here we are again with no shot unless my new DC and OC can finally pull us out of this black hole of 4-5 win seasons which amazingly keeps us in OPL. What the heck do we have to do to get demoted? lol
 
murgy
offline
Link
 
Shut the fuck up. Both of you. You're both bad at this game.
 
Ruger7mmmag
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by murgy
Shut the fuck up. Both of you. You're both bad at this game.


lol You're a loser...I don't measure myself by dot ball...
 
yello1
Preacher
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by beenlurken
Again the range (or however else you want to define it to deflect your ignorance) is unchanged.. the oberons of Nat pro continue to get destroyed by same point differentials.. the only thing that has changed is that Nat pro has had several waves of old rebuild teams (teams that restarted with new building process and/or archetypes) finally reach end game and pushed a lot of the guts out of Nat Pro. It has nothing to do with anything Bort has done.. well unless you consider his buff to CPU dots..


Been, you keep ignoring the fact that this is happening ACROSS THE ENTIRE SPECTRUM OF GLB. Just like its not all about how much I suck, its also not all about how much OPL sucks.

When Bort nerfed the AEQ stack, it leveled the playing field to some extent. When he gave everyone bonus Skill Points, , it leveled the playing field to some extent. When he let everyone boost three extra levels towards 79, it leveled the playing field to some extent. Intentionally or not all of those moves allowed the guys who were a couple steps behind to close the gap on the elite builds and teams.

Its ludicrous to think that had no effect on the game, and its even sillier to see that effect in the term of an overnight closing up of the score differences and pretend that that was caused by anything other than those changes.

Might be that Bort did more behind the scenes as well. Might be that the effect you are mentioned ALSO had a hand. But the mechanics of the game make it clear that giving a hand up to the bottom and nerfing the top is going to make the bottom and top closer. And thats what happened.

Originally posted by beenlurken
So while that may be good for the delusional few like yourself who are happy about more close games it does not change the fact that those teams still have no chance at a title. The overwhelming majority who play this game want a shot at the title and that just isn't happening.


Well, yes and no. SOME of those teams that were a step away from contending will have gotten close enough to have a shot now. But no it doesn't make the game an IROC race with everyone driving the same governed engined cars, no.

But as I have said before, that was never my desire nor intent and NEVER what I have been talking about with you.

Its what YOU want to talk about, but its not been my complaint. When I complained about the big goofy scores and stats it was complaining JUST about those scores and stats, and only because they were in and of themselves stupid. It was never about making the 0 in the 100-0 game a winner. It was about making the 0 lose 28 to 0 or some other NFL realistic looking number instead.

I'm going to post that sentence again. Read it. Its the ONLY point I have ever had here.

It was never about making the 0 in the 100-0 game a winner. It was about making the 0 lose 28 to 0 or some other NFL realistic looking number instead.

Originally posted by beenlurken
Again look at Ruger/Oberon, he could give a shit about more close games... he just wants to be in a situation where he has a shot at a title.. he has made that very clear. It is very relevant to the reality of what most want out of this game and your delusions of what it should be.


That as may be, but without question there are also people who see a 200-0 score and think this game sucks and walk away purely because of that stupid azzed score.

I have been a player on teams where the owner sold the team the day after a score like that, and quit the game. And its understandable. A score like that means the game is disconnected from real football, not a simulation at all. And it can make someone conclude they can never compete they must suck ALOT and they may as well go play something else because they can never win.

Whereas a 20-0 score can make them think they still have a shot and it would seem more realistic and make them feel like they are in a football simulation. Thats good for player retention.

Thats always been my interest in our discussions.

Not that your desire about improving competition is a bad desire. But its just not what you and I have been talking about. Or at least its not what I am talking about.

The fact that we are talking about two different things is probably why it seems like you never get what I am saying. Take the time to understand it and maybe we can put this puppy to bed.
 
yello1
Preacher
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by The Big Cack Envy
tl;dr


Ritalin
 
Link
 
Originally posted by murgy
Shut the fuck up. Both of you. You're both bad at this game.


thats pretty good sig material imo
 
Link
 
OPL forums were not so dead last time i was here.... WTH????
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.