Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Sarg01
I can't imagine it'd fire much with 62 carrying vs 80 vision CBs, or that it'd accomplish much even if it did. I'd go with Catch Fake if you're trying that.

plus he n e thing with a fake % piece of aeq benefits... i e catch fake, head fake, pump fake, and of course the others.



n e thing with fake in it also gets to benefit from the fake % piece... so that will help that fire and i think Originally posted by bhall43
Its all agility man.

Originally posted by cymaddux31
B+,. dont care for clock manager on a WR. Could always use some blocking to help your teams run game, higher vision as well. I would have put a few more in agility rather than Speed for a POSS WR>

not do this

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Do you have fake % on those WRs or just QF?

Naw I don't have fake %. Had better ideas for aeqs.

Originally posted by Forbin
I'd rather see strength and jumping about even instead of jumping so much higher. I'm starting to think that strength plays a much larger role in the catch rolls than people realize.

If that were true, break tackle wrs would be really good. And they aren't.

Originally posted by bhall43
If that were true, break tackle wrs would be really good. And they aren't.
I'm going to test that.

Originally posted by bhall43
If that were true, break tackle wrs would be really good. And they aren't.

Eh, 90% of people building a "break tackle" WR don't know what they're doing, as you know. Without 80+ catching, all the strength in the world won't matter, and I've seen plenty of "break tackle" WRs even at Pro/WL level with sub-par catching,carrying.

Originally posted by Forbin
Eh, 90% of people building a "break tackle" WR don't know what they're doing, as you know. Without 80+ catching, all the strength in the world won't matter, and I've seen plenty of "break tackle" WRs even at Pro/WL level with sub-par catching,carrying.

Every break tackle wr worth a damn already has that bro.

Originally posted by jdbolick

I'm going to test that.

Go ahead. The results pretty much suck. Its not that these wrs don't have enough strength, its that they aren't even getting the roll in many cases to win.

Originally posted by jdbolick

I'm going to test that.

Id be curious to know this experiment, being that none of us have a GLB lab or test forum...do you?? I think strength plays a small role, but that is about it. Catching/jumping/carrying with 40+ strength and separation of the dot from the CB ftw every time.

Originally posted by jdbolick


Seriously...tell us how you are going to determine this information. When I read science journals when I was going thru my ph.d, i always wanted to know how the experiment was performed, otherwise your data is worthless.

Either way, I have a couple guys who are close, and different, enough that after the first 5 games of the season, I hope to further my insight into this topic.

Originally posted by TheGreatAus
Seriously...tell us how you are going to determine this information. When I read science journals when I was going thru my ph.d, i always wanted to know how the experiment was performed, otherwise your data is worthless.

Either way, I have a couple guys who are close, and different, enough that after the first 5 games of the season, I hope to further my insight into this topic.

When someone has built as many WRs as bhall, they've probably tested different builds while holding most variables constant and testing others.