They played a good challenge, them being APL. I was surprised our upper teams struggled so much. Those guys in the APL were saying BSS should have been the 3rd seed or so. I really thought we'd take all but maybe 2 to 3 of them. Who knew APL would be a tougher challenge then CPL? Crazy GLB
Forum > European Pro League > Eastern Europe Conference > Season 18 EEPL/APL challenge results--The Battle for The Strait of Gibraltar
Hickster
offline
offline
sims have thrown a loop to all of us this season..we definitely got smacked in our game but with EEPL having such a good upper half in strong teams we always have a good chance to prevail in the end as a whole
EEPL is so much deeper then the others. It's crazy, in every other league you have 3-4 super teams then it just falls off drastically. Here we have about 6 on each side that are fighting and the 7-10 are all about equal.
Kenshinzen
offline
offline
Originally posted by JTsNiners
EEPL is so much deeper then the others. It's crazy, in every other league you have 3-4 super teams then it just falls off drastically. Here we have about 6 on each side that are fighting and the 7-10 are all about equal.
yep, that's true. great league!
EEPL is so much deeper then the others. It's crazy, in every other league you have 3-4 super teams then it just falls off drastically. Here we have about 6 on each side that are fighting and the 7-10 are all about equal.
yep, that's true. great league!
Moretti
offline
offline
Originally posted by JTsNiners
They played a good challenge, them being APL. I was surprised our upper teams struggled so much. Those guys in the APL were saying BSS should have been the 3rd seed or so. I really thought we'd take all but maybe 2 to 3 of them. Who knew APL would be a tougher challenge then CPL? Crazy GLB
I ranked the APL teams and honestly I felt at the time the 4-11 were pretty close together...now there has been some separation as some teams have fallen off for some reason or another. We had one team that had an undefeated season last year and lost in the conference finals not sign up to play which i feel was a pretty big blow for APLs side. I placed BSS up that high based on how they had performed even though they had lost to my own team which I had several spots lower after struggling out of the gate. We also had 6 or 7 of the teams in that tournament as brand new teams to the pro league that most of us "vets" had little knowledge of their play. APL is also represented by 4 WL teams which in my mind is pretty solid.
They played a good challenge, them being APL. I was surprised our upper teams struggled so much. Those guys in the APL were saying BSS should have been the 3rd seed or so. I really thought we'd take all but maybe 2 to 3 of them. Who knew APL would be a tougher challenge then CPL? Crazy GLB
I ranked the APL teams and honestly I felt at the time the 4-11 were pretty close together...now there has been some separation as some teams have fallen off for some reason or another. We had one team that had an undefeated season last year and lost in the conference finals not sign up to play which i feel was a pretty big blow for APLs side. I placed BSS up that high based on how they had performed even though they had lost to my own team which I had several spots lower after struggling out of the gate. We also had 6 or 7 of the teams in that tournament as brand new teams to the pro league that most of us "vets" had little knowledge of their play. APL is also represented by 4 WL teams which in my mind is pretty solid.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
