Warrior General Games

Is this archetype used at the Pro/WL level? If so, how are they used? RO, LO, ILB?

they might be used now but I don't know if they'll be used in the future.

Originally posted by Darren McFadden
they might be used now but I don't know if they'll be used in the future.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1330593

Here's one.

Originally posted by Darren McFadden
they might be used now but I don't know if they'll be used in the future.

hmm, that sucks. im guessing the RO's have to be HH, but i wasnt sure how IL and LO went with their builds. i'd also guess it has more to do with the DC requirements.

Why would any linebacker have to be a HH? especially not RO.

Originally posted by The Fromunda Cheeseheads
hmm, that sucks. im guessing the RO's have to be HH, but i wasnt sure how IL and LO went with their builds. i'd also guess it has more to do with the DC requirements.

I'd reckon ROLB would be blitzers more than anything, LOLB would be coverage usually

Originally posted by naraic
I'd reckon ROLB would be blitzers more than anything, LOLB would be coverage usually

yeah, i forgot about the blitzer arch. thanks.

I think the coverage archetype is better for blitzing.

Originally posted by Rage Kinard
I think the coverage archetype is better for blitzing.

i tend to agree, its majors are significantly better.

So you'd rather have 70 tackling and 100 vision on a blitzer? Or 100 tackling and 70 vision on a blitzer.... Not much difference between vision and getting a jump on the snap...

Significant radius of distance for tackling....= more sacks.... This is completely opinion...Originally posted by SunshineMan89
Originally posted by Rage Kinard

I think the coverage archetype is better for blitzing.

Originally posted by Underdawg08
So you'd rather have 70 tackling and 100 vision on a blitzer? Or 100 tackling and 70 vision on a blitzer.... Not much difference between vision and getting a jump on the snap...

Significant radius of distance for tackling....= more sacks.... This is completely opinion...Originally posted by SunshineMan89

Originally posted by Rage Kinard


I think the coverage archetype is better for blitzing.





please back up the statement that tackling increases tackle radius by a link to Bort or catch's post please.

If it will work I like HH for blitzing, I'll find out in a season or two when I can max out first step. I'm not convinced that you need 140 speed to get sacks.

Originally posted by Rage Kinard
I think the coverage archetype is better for blitzing.

I think Coverage and Blitzer are pretty much equal, because speed and agility is going to keep you occupied so long that ALGs will almost become moot .