Warrior General Games

well i know you work hard on this ranking tom but it just doesnt seem to be close to what the real power rankings should be

minnesota at 6? nah no way
snk and no offense to their team cause i think they are a good team but ranked 2-nope
and finally las vegas has been stellar but to put them that far up on ez? nah that system need to be rethought recalculated and redone period lol.

I do appreciate the time you put in this though and is great to read nonetheless

Originally posted by hickster97200
well i know you work hard on this ranking tom but it just doesnt seem to be close to what the real power rankings should be

minnesota at 6? nah no way
snk and no offense to their team cause i think they are a good team but ranked 2-nope
and finally las vegas has been stellar but to put them that far up on ez? nah that system need to be rethought recalculated and redone period lol.

I do appreciate the time you put in this though and is great to read nonetheless

This rating is entirely based on quality wins and bad losses. Minnesota has just not faced any tough teams yet.

Minnesota has proved very little this season only looking at wins. They have beat Oakland (0-4), Lauier (1-3 with only a win over Colorado), Colorado (0-4), and San Francisco (1-3 with only a win over Colorado). They also don't have any losses yet. I don't take into account margin of victory, and they do have a big edge there.

Las Vegas has beaten a lot of good teams. SNK and Tallahassee are each (3-1) with only losing to LV. SNK and Talahassee have beaten quality teams like Texas and New Jersey, so they are nothing to laugh at.

Point is, Las Vegas, EZ, Talahassee, SNK have all done a lot this season to prove their worth, and Minnesota hasn't yet. Once they play a few quality teams, it will likely improve for them.

well we will see what we can do to make minnesota fall further down that ranking of yours then

Originally posted by tomcollins
Originally posted by hickster97200

well i know you work hard on this ranking tom but it just doesnt seem to be close to what the real power rankings should be

minnesota at 6? nah no way
snk and no offense to their team cause i think they are a good team but ranked 2-nope
and finally las vegas has been stellar but to put them that far up on ez? nah that system need to be rethought recalculated and redone period lol.

I do appreciate the time you put in this though and is great to read nonetheless

This rating is entirely based on quality wins and bad losses. Minnesota has just not faced any tough teams yet.

Minnesota has proved very little this season only looking at wins. They have beat Oakland (0-4), Lauier (1-3 with only a win over Colorado), Colorado (0-4), and San Francisco (1-3 with only a win over Colorado). They also don't have any losses yet. I don't take into account margin of victory, and they do have a big edge there.

Las Vegas has beaten a lot of good teams. SNK and Tallahassee are each (3-1) with only losing to LV. SNK and Talahassee have beaten quality teams like Texas and New Jersey, so they are nothing to laugh at.

Point is, Las Vegas, EZ, Talahassee, SNK have all done a lot this season to prove their worth, and Minnesota hasn't yet. Once they play a few quality teams, it will likely improve for them.

I agree with everything but the last paragraph. If you think we haven't proven our worth in this league, go watch a sim. We haven't shown we deserved to be higher rated in your power rankings, that's fair, but to flat out say we haven't proven our worth when we've won every game by at least 20 points is a bit much.

Originally posted by hickster97200
well we will see what we can do to make minnesota fall further down that ranking of yours then

We've had you circled on the calendar for a while now, so don't disappoint us.

Originally posted by tomcollins
Originally posted by hickster97200

well i know you work hard on this ranking tom but it just doesnt seem to be close to what the real power rankings should be

minnesota at 6? nah no way
snk and no offense to their team cause i think they are a good team but ranked 2-nope
and finally las vegas has been stellar but to put them that far up on ez? nah that system need to be rethought recalculated and redone period lol.

I do appreciate the time you put in this though and is great to read nonetheless

This rating is entirely based on quality wins and bad losses. Minnesota has just not faced any tough teams yet.

Minnesota has proved very little this season only looking at wins. They have beat Oakland (0-4), Lauier (1-3 with only a win over Colorado), Colorado (0-4), and San Francisco (1-3 with only a win over Colorado). They also don't have any losses yet. I don't take into account margin of victory, and they do have a big edge there.

Las Vegas has beaten a lot of good teams. SNK and Tallahassee are each (3-1) with only losing to LV. SNK and Talahassee have beaten quality teams like Texas and New Jersey, so they are nothing to laugh at.

Point is, Las Vegas, EZ, Talahassee, SNK have all done a lot this season to prove their worth, and Minnesota hasn't yet. Once they play a few quality teams, it will likely improve for them.

We've had an early easy road, but we've played well. We'll see how real we are over the next few games....

Don't knock San Fran though, all 3 losses are to really good teams

well it would be a really good game if our chemistry was a bit higher but not going to search for excuses..i really think we should have a hell of a ballgame. Good luck Minnesota

Originally posted by hickster97200
well it would be a really good game if our chemistry was a bit higher but not going to search for excuses..i really think we should have a hell of a ballgame. Good luck Minnesota

its going to be a tough one

Good luck to you too as well texas.