Originally posted by Djinnt
rather have 48 strength/68 tackling than 60/60 if I were focused on KL
with tackling now supposedly having a higher role in tackling (and probably also FFs, and therefore KL), i would probably agree with you now.
rather have 48 strength/68 tackling than 60/60 if I were focused on KL
with tackling now supposedly having a higher role in tackling (and probably also FFs, and therefore KL), i would probably agree with you now.






























