http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3829356&page=last#34013430
One less team moving down from WL
One less team moving down from WL
Forum > North American Pro League > Canada Conference > Marblehead longhorns of WL will disband after the season
cwrujosh
offline
offline
This will continue to happen until this game realizes that teams get tired of recruiting a brand new team every 2 seasons.
I'm starting to wonder if a global reset isn't a good idea after all.
I'm starting to wonder if a global reset isn't a good idea after all.
Plateau needs to be longer at the very least. Rework XP/SP so that dots are entering their "prime" earlier and stay longer. First 7-8 seasons of dot building suck when you are building towards the Pro/WL game.
Archetype is a perfect time to split the system and eventually let the old model/system decline. Don't let the 2 styles intertwine.
Archetype is a perfect time to split the system and eventually let the old model/system decline. Don't let the 2 styles intertwine.
Edited by evileyez on Mar 10, 2010 08:31:42
thelanger
offline
offline
Originally posted by evileyez
Plateau needs to be longer at the very least. Rework XP/SP so that dots are entering their "prime" earlier and stay longer. First 7-8 seasons of dot building suck when you are building towards the Pro/WL game.
Archetype is a perfect time to split the system and eventually let the old model/system decline. Don't let the 2 styles intertwine.
agree with this - sad to see Marblehead go too.
Plateau needs to be longer at the very least. Rework XP/SP so that dots are entering their "prime" earlier and stay longer. First 7-8 seasons of dot building suck when you are building towards the Pro/WL game.
Archetype is a perfect time to split the system and eventually let the old model/system decline. Don't let the 2 styles intertwine.
agree with this - sad to see Marblehead go too.
curtishall06
offline
offline
Originally posted by cwrujosh
This will continue to happen until this game realizes that teams get tired of recruiting a brand new team every 2 seasons.
I'm starting to wonder if a global reset isn't a good idea after all.
I agree bro, Bort has NO CLUE what team owners go through with recruiting and sustaining a top notch program! Has to rework the peak of players so that they last longer! You cover any 64 EQ, its like throwing cash out the window, more times then not that player is going to retire come seasons end.
Im still a BIG proponent of when a team pays for EQ, whatever portion they help pay for, they recover say a 50% or 75 % of their cash back once that player retires. Would fix alot of cash flow problems with teams and be an incentive for owners to pay for the upper tier EQ for players.
This will continue to happen until this game realizes that teams get tired of recruiting a brand new team every 2 seasons.
I'm starting to wonder if a global reset isn't a good idea after all.
I agree bro, Bort has NO CLUE what team owners go through with recruiting and sustaining a top notch program! Has to rework the peak of players so that they last longer! You cover any 64 EQ, its like throwing cash out the window, more times then not that player is going to retire come seasons end.
Im still a BIG proponent of when a team pays for EQ, whatever portion they help pay for, they recover say a 50% or 75 % of their cash back once that player retires. Would fix alot of cash flow problems with teams and be an incentive for owners to pay for the upper tier EQ for players.
i know theres been some discussion to have the team own eq and pay for upkeep or something so money still matters a bit .... but Bort likes to hide behind the dumb statement that eq was never meant for every dot. i think he should have to explain to agents that even though they pay the same flex as the guy next to them, they can't have their full upgrades ....
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
