User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Position Talk > CB Club > Does Aura of Int work for a CB ?
HerrWuff
offline
Link
 
Did anybody ever try Aura of Int on a CB ?
Or is it known, that it won't work ?
The description sounds very good for man to man coverage

I'm rolling for a piece of SDC for ever and start to think, that I will setlle for something else
 
Worker 3
offline
Link
 
its debatable as to whether or not it works for LBs... and if it does work, its not enough for it to be worth while. then you take it over to a CB, where you would need 2 pieces of it to take it to an "effective level", and its not worth it. if youre tired of looking for SDC, go for SV, SB, or CD.
 
ShadowWolf
offline
Link
 
I am currently using it. I am not sure if it works or not but very few passes are thrown my way.
 
Theo Wizzago
Coyote
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ShadowWolf
I am currently using it. I am not sure if it works or not but very few passes are thrown my way.


That may be the kicker there... that the 'Aura of Int' doesn't mean more int's but means QB's >think< it might happen so they don't throw your way.

 
HerrWuff
offline
Link
 
It could lower the WRs morale, when you cover him 1on1
That should make it easier to cover him
But it looks like noone really knows, if it works that way
It could also simply make it easier to tackle the WR
 
bruiser 1234
offline
Link
 
It specifically says LB in the title
 
bruiser 1234
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Theo Wizzago
Originally posted by ShadowWolf

I am currently using it. I am not sure if it works or not but very few passes are thrown my way.


That may be the kicker there... that the 'Aura of Int' doesn't mean more int's but means QB's >think< it might happen so they don't throw your way.



And its Aura of Intimidation, It is not Aura of Interception. It reduces morale of people around them.
 
HerrWuff
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bruiser 1234
It specifically says LB in the title


That's because it was not possible to acquire that SA for any other position, when the description was written
 
Billy Corman
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bruiser 1234
It specifically says LB in the title


Its not clarified to be LB-only the way the Generals and Protector are.
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.