alltyme
offline
offline
Originally posted by bjensen23
62 yarder to be correct but very nice... what is his strength at?
Ah yes, gave myself a yard on accident. Just 78 nat - no EQ.
62 yarder to be correct but very nice... what is his strength at?
Ah yes, gave myself a yard on accident. Just 78 nat - no EQ.
bashildy
offline
offline
Only bad part is that you didn't get that many TBs and gave up field position on kickoffs. FG wise, that's the best I've ever seen though.
alltyme
offline
offline
Originally posted by bashildy
Only bad part is that you didn't get that many TBs and gave up field position on kickoffs. FG wise, that's the best I've ever seen though.
Picky, picky.
Only 1 kick didn't make it to the EZ. Aggressive KR ands some sloppy tackling didn't help.
Only bad part is that you didn't get that many TBs and gave up field position on kickoffs. FG wise, that's the best I've ever seen though.
Picky, picky.

Only 1 kick didn't make it to the EZ. Aggressive KR ands some sloppy tackling didn't help.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.





























