Well, it's really not very fair that the best teams get tons extra money to upgrade (through playoffs) and make it even easier to keep being one of the very best teams.
Originally posted by j0shle0 What does money have to do with being the best team?
If your the best team you'll probably be in the playoff and playing at home. So, you'll get more money to upgrade your stadium because of the payoff income. If you have more money, than you can sign better players. And if you have better players, you'll be a better team and win again.
That was the case last season. Bort is going to start fucking up teams at our level with players that are too high. I believe he's specifically made reference to people using money to stack their teams being against the spirit of the game.
Originally posted by xnahog You must be a liberal.
Actually, I was just trying to be a braggart while not sounding like one. Notice how it comes off as a complaint of the system but conveniently insinuates that Huntsville was one of the best and still is one of the best?
I really like the natural selection aspect of the game. I always used that method to justify drinking more beer, the slower weaker brain cells get killed off thus making your brain faster and more efficiant
I heard Bort was going to do revenue sharing in this upcoming playoffs so it should equal out more. But since we all started together last year, how is it not fair if the playof teams get more money?
Judging by what I've seen there are still teams that don't understand the financial/stadium/tickets/concessions side of the game. And they will suffer in the long run?