GG Glasgow
Mike1709
offline
offline
Well played Affliction, beat us easily in every department today. We've struggled to move the ball on offense all season, but our defense has played pretty well throughout, not today though 

ricksta1975
offline
offline
Originally posted by trentw
GG London....We just seem to have lost all ability to compete.
GG to you too. Our D managed to play some decent ball for the first time in ages in that first half and it gave our offence the platform to perform and take the game away from you.
Maybe old age is catching up on you!

ricksta1975
offline
offline
Originally posted by ultrajer
GG Druids, well for us anyway, you guys are still competitive when you try, I am guessing you have all but given up. And your still better than 6 other Zeta teams imo
its true. in zeta they would get several wins.
GG Druids, well for us anyway, you guys are still competitive when you try, I am guessing you have all but given up. And your still better than 6 other Zeta teams imo
its true. in zeta they would get several wins.
a49erfan77
offline
offline
Originally posted by ricksta1975
its true. in zeta they would get several wins.
That's BS, they'd get 4 at the most....
its true. in zeta they would get several wins.
That's BS, they'd get 4 at the most....
Zickzack
offline
offline
Originally posted by a49erfan77
That's BS, they'd get 4 at the most....
And 4 is not several?
That's BS, they'd get 4 at the most....
And 4 is not several?

a49erfan77
offline
offline
Originally posted by Zickzack
And 4 is not several?
I guess...depends on if you are comparing it to 0 or 16
And 4 is not several?

I guess...depends on if you are comparing it to 0 or 16

URL54MVP
offline
offline
Originally posted by Mike1709
Well played Affliction, beat us easily in every department today. We've struggled to move the ball on offense all season, but our defense has played pretty well throughout, not today though
We have a lazy DC imo.
Well played Affliction, beat us easily in every department today. We've struggled to move the ball on offense all season, but our defense has played pretty well throughout, not today though

We have a lazy DC imo.

EagleOtto
offline
offline
GG Parts Unknown, your running QB gashed us bad, glad that you didn't dial that number up more often
ricksta1975
offline
offline
Originally posted by Zickzack
And 4 is not several?
several = more than 2 and less than lots
And 4 is not several?

several = more than 2 and less than lots
finnmaccoul
offline
offline
Originally posted by Zickzack
Originally posted by a49erfan77
That's BS, they'd get 4 at the most....
And 4 is not several?
Main Entry: several
Function: pronoun, plural in construction
Date: 1639
: an indefinite number more than two and fewer than many <several of the guests>
Main Entry: many
Function: noun, plural in construction
Date: 12th century
1 : a large but indefinite number <a good many of them>
2 : the great majority of people <the many>
Originally posted by a49erfan77
That's BS, they'd get 4 at the most....
And 4 is not several?

Main Entry: several
Function: pronoun, plural in construction
Date: 1639
: an indefinite number more than two and fewer than many <several of the guests>
Main Entry: many
Function: noun, plural in construction
Date: 12th century
1 : a large but indefinite number <a good many of them>
2 : the great majority of people <the many>
Edited by finnmaccoul on Dec 31, 2009 11:51:17
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.

























