User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
mraadt
offline
Link
 
GG Glasgow
 
BellyCheck
offline
Link
 
GG Plainview... You kept us in check pretty well until the end
 
Mike1709
offline
Link
 
Well played Affliction, beat us easily in every department today. We've struggled to move the ball on offense all season, but our defense has played pretty well throughout, not today though
 
ricksta1975
offline
Link
 

Originally posted by trentw
GG London....We just seem to have lost all ability to compete.


GG to you too. Our D managed to play some decent ball for the first time in ages in that first half and it gave our offence the platform to perform and take the game away from you.

Maybe old age is catching up on you!
 
ricksta1975
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ultrajer
GG Druids, well for us anyway, you guys are still competitive when you try, I am guessing you have all but given up. And your still better than 6 other Zeta teams imo


its true. in zeta they would get several wins.
 
ufgatorbait
offline
Link
 
GG Purple!
 
a49erfan77
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ricksta1975
its true. in zeta they would get several wins.


That's BS, they'd get 4 at the most....
 
Zickzack
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by a49erfan77
That's BS, they'd get 4 at the most....


And 4 is not several?
 
Jayadamo
Vol4Life
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by slappdogg
gg vols


lies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
a49erfan77
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Zickzack
And 4 is not several?


I guess...depends on if you are comparing it to 0 or 16
 
URL54MVP
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Mike1709
Well played Affliction, beat us easily in every department today. We've struggled to move the ball on offense all season, but our defense has played pretty well throughout, not today though


We have a lazy DC imo.
 
EagleOtto
offline
Link
 
GG Parts Unknown, your running QB gashed us bad, glad that you didn't dial that number up more often
 
ricksta1975
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Zickzack
And 4 is not several?


several = more than 2 and less than lots
 
finnmaccoul
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Zickzack
Originally posted by a49erfan77

That's BS, they'd get 4 at the most....


And 4 is not several?


Main Entry: several
Function: pronoun, plural in construction
Date: 1639
: an indefinite number more than two and fewer than many <several of the guests>


Main Entry: many
Function: noun, plural in construction
Date: 12th century
1 : a large but indefinite number <a good many of them>
2 : the great majority of people <the many>




Edited by finnmaccoul on Dec 31, 2009 11:51:17
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.