what do you guys think of a monster hit aeq on cb 
Jazzpelli
offline
offline
Originally posted by sooner_nation
I thought I read Bort saying SA's are only good with 10 and anything over would reduce the SA's effect?
no, he said its reducing gains past 10.
think that if you got a 5% bonus for each level, at 10, you would be at 50% bonus but at 11, you would be at 53% not 55%. Just made of the numbers for the example but that's the gist of it.
I thought I read Bort saying SA's are only good with 10 and anything over would reduce the SA's effect?
no, he said its reducing gains past 10.
think that if you got a 5% bonus for each level, at 10, you would be at 50% bonus but at 11, you would be at 53% not 55%. Just made of the numbers for the example but that's the gist of it.
Bladnach
offline
offline
Originally posted by lilimad
what do you guys think of a monster hit aeq on cb
I think it'd be cool but you'd probably need 2 monster hit aeqs to make it work not to mention high strength/tackling (and 60 isn't high). Would be really tough to make a heavy hitter CB without really sacrificing on much needed areas. You can make a true hard hitter SS with like 80/80 str/tkl and still have really good rounded out other abilities but CB is a bit tougher.
Definitely wouldn't do it if your build is already a normal CB build though. Better off holding out for SDC, SV or +PD%
what do you guys think of a monster hit aeq on cb
I think it'd be cool but you'd probably need 2 monster hit aeqs to make it work not to mention high strength/tackling (and 60 isn't high). Would be really tough to make a heavy hitter CB without really sacrificing on much needed areas. You can make a true hard hitter SS with like 80/80 str/tkl and still have really good rounded out other abilities but CB is a bit tougher.
Definitely wouldn't do it if your build is already a normal CB build though. Better off holding out for SDC, SV or +PD%
Edited by chronoaug on Dec 17, 2009 23:41:07
Mike Hammer Jarlsson
offline
offline
Originally posted by Jazzpelli
Originally posted by sooner_nation
I thought I read Bort saying SA's are only good with 10 and anything over would reduce the SA's effect?
no, he said its reducing gains past 10.
think that if you got a 5% bonus for each level, at 10, you would be at 50% bonus but at 11, you would be at 53% not 55%. Just made of the numbers for the example but that's the gist of it.
Hey Jazz, I remember reading, but I can't find, a quote from Bort saying that VA's kick in 4, 7 and 11 then max's out at 15 with everything from 11 having a diminshed return... I'll try and find the thread for you all.
Originally posted by sooner_nation
I thought I read Bort saying SA's are only good with 10 and anything over would reduce the SA's effect?
no, he said its reducing gains past 10.
think that if you got a 5% bonus for each level, at 10, you would be at 50% bonus but at 11, you would be at 53% not 55%. Just made of the numbers for the example but that's the gist of it.
Hey Jazz, I remember reading, but I can't find, a quote from Bort saying that VA's kick in 4, 7 and 11 then max's out at 15 with everything from 11 having a diminshed return... I'll try and find the thread for you all.
Qillar
offline
offline
Originally posted by Mike Hammer Jarlsson
Hey Jazz, I remember reading, but I can't find, a quote from Bort saying that VA's kick in 4, 7 and 11 then max's out at 15 with everything from 11 having a diminshed return... I'll try and find the thread for you all.
You mean SAs, right? I would be interested in seeing this quote. Are you saying 4,7,11 are bigger boosts or getting an SA to 5 or 6 adds nothing? I have heard of the diminishing returns over 10, and I remember seeing a Bort quote awhile ago about this.
Hey Jazz, I remember reading, but I can't find, a quote from Bort saying that VA's kick in 4, 7 and 11 then max's out at 15 with everything from 11 having a diminshed return... I'll try and find the thread for you all.
You mean SAs, right? I would be interested in seeing this quote. Are you saying 4,7,11 are bigger boosts or getting an SA to 5 or 6 adds nothing? I have heard of the diminishing returns over 10, and I remember seeing a Bort quote awhile ago about this.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
