User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Position Talk > HB Club > Strength, Carrying, and Tackle Breaking
marcello
offline
Link
 
Ok, all other things equal, what is better for breaking tackles:

68 strength, 48 carrying.

or

60 strength, 60 carrying.

or

48 strength, 68 carrying.
 
Jack Del Rio
offline
Link
 
first one
 
willb285
offline
Link
 
depends on other factors. If you have a *High* agility and have something like max quick feet and slippery combo, then the third would be way better for that type of back.

If you are a power back and have the points invested in that track, then I would say the second one. Carrying has a lot to do with breaking tackles, and the extra 12 carrying will be much more noticeable than 8 extra strength especially since it's at 60.
 
ufgatorbait
offline
Link
 
Well thought out question - in for answers.
 
marcello
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by willb285
depends on other factors. If you have a *High* agility and have something like max quick feet and slippery combo, then the third would be way better for that type of back.

If you are a power back and have the points invested in that track, then I would say the second one. Carrying has a lot to do with breaking tackles, and the extra 12 carrying will be much more noticeable than 8 extra strength especially since it's at 60.


78 agility, slippery will be maxed eventually, but no quick feet. I think I'm also going to post this in the main GLB forum to try to get more people to see it.
Edited by marcello on Oct 23, 2009 14:10:43
Edited by marcello on Oct 23, 2009 13:51:01
 
ufgatorbait
offline
Link
 
Please do so marcello.
 
marcello
offline
Link
 
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3412186
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.