Warrior General Games

If you guys could post which or what is more important in deciding a rankings, I can add that to the weekly matchups.
I was thinking in this order:
Record
Rosters size (The early boosters will always have a higher ranking than the non boosters because they have the slight advantage for wins)
Pts allowed to points scored (Lowest allowed to highest scored)
Rushing
Passing
Missed Tackles

Using those formulas?

I would think points allowed to points scored should be above roster size.

Originally posted by LordEvil
If you guys could post which or what is more important in deciding a rankings, I can add that to the weekly matchups.
I was thinking in this order:
Record
Rosters size (The early boosters will always have a higher ranking than the non boosters because they have the slight advantage for wins)
Pts allowed to points scored (Lowest allowed to highest scored)
Rushing
Passing
Missed Tackles

Using those formulas?

So do you rank the early boosters higher or lower? If you took the gameday roster sizes and compared them, I think the win would count more for the lower of the two teams.

I think anyone that completes a pass for positive yardage should receive a +1 GLB BCS point to their ranking. Actually, you should get a +1 for every completion that gained yardage and double points if it came on 3rd down.

Points based by margin of victory and strength of schedule, as in the BCS.

I know I know!! BCS and GLB or about the worst acronyms I can think of right now.

GLB
GimpedLousyBastards

IMO monitoring pancakes is one of the best indicators of a team's strength. You don't see many teams win the game while losing the pancake war.