Warrior General Games

Originally posted by taurran
Originally posted by kcdizz

Originally posted by ericb45696


BH sucks for WR IMO.

this. It really only helps on bad throws. Throws on target dont require any boost to get the ball otherwise youd over run your route. great for defense.

This thread is obviously just a bunch of people spouting off things they've heard like a bunch of parrots.

chirp chirp lil parrot?

haha. do some research, which means more than just looking thru the forums and reading what us"parrots" spout off.

BH is better for a CB than a WR, much better VA's for a WR IMO.

and yes, thats just my opinion., and yes, I have no statistical and factual testing to prove it. but bring it and show me the math!!!!!

Originally posted by tetura
Originally posted by PsychoMan001

Originally posted by ultranollie


Which sux because I wanna know if it works on all passes or deflected/bad passes. The VA thread I quoted said it only works on bad/deflected passes. Anyone with real knowledge?

that thread is old ... it begins working when the player sees the ball coming, not when the ball is deflected

yeah, it "works" on all passes in the sense that the VA can be active.

when it was first created it was for deflected passes only, but changed last season so it is when he sees the ball coming.

The idea that it only "works" on bad throws is just because if it's a good throw, the WR doesn't need extra speed/agi to get to the ball. On a bad throw, he'd have to adjust to it and could use the boost. So it's always useful for a CB, but not always useful for a WR.

And the longer the ball is in the air, the more time you have for BH to work, so it is more useful on long plays than short. So better on speedsters who tend to go deep a lot, than possession type receivers working the underneath routes.

+1

Originally posted by whatje
Originally posted by crackazo

Originally posted by whatje


wtf change ur avatar ur confusing me



good response....touche.

lol thx.