Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Oofty

I think what he was getting at was not efficiency in terms of SPs used but in terms of practical results. After all, the marginal return per SP of getting 3-4 stamina levels (before the 1st cap obviously) is much less than getting even a single level of agility when you're in the range of 68-73. This is *especially* true when you take into account the amount of training required to do the same exact thing.

Its more efficient to train agility at 68 than it is to train stamina at 35. Sure it takes longer, but the payoff is 4 times a great.

^ truth

Originally posted by OMGWTF
Originally posted by rmiller517

Originally posted by HeadlesssKES


I would get the stamina to at least 50....

eh no.

in this order: get speed and carrying to 68. agility to 60. then work on stamina / vision / SAs.



Just keep training vision/stamina/confidence while you're raising these attributes. I think your HB is salvagable, and he could be very good. He's only level 31 and you haven't really screwed him up, he's just not ideal.


Listen to OMGWTF! He knows what he is doing!



DMP

Originally posted by Daddy Warbucks
Uh, no.
As long as you have over 30-33 stamina it will not kill your build to spend points there.
In fact, any time you distribute to a (useful) attribute in the range of 33-48 those are the most efficient SP you can distribute into your build mathematically speaking.

I'm not condoning taking your stamina higher fyi, just pointing out the fallacy in this logic.

That's probably true from a mathematical standpoint, but the thing is it also assumes that one point in stamina is equal in usefulness to one point in agility (unless I'm misunderstanding you?), which isn't really true.

I stated my point poorly--I kind of meant putting SP in stamina in general (which I think most people would agree is unnecessary for a long, long time)--but it doesn't really change the basic advice, as I don't think the OP should not spend SP in stamina at the moment.