User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
WiSeIVIaN
offline
Link
 
Go to guy is a waste. Even for WRs (primarily possession) who need to get the ball more but don't get "open", you can get the same effect by actually talking to the QB and have him set you to primary target, and still have your 15 VA points left.

My TE for instance led my team with a 74% completion percentage last season, and I had him set to the primary favorite target because of that in part.
 
32mewelde32
offline
Link
 
Go 2 Guy can be useful if its a solid 5th wr on the DC and the opposing defence doesnt have alot of depth imo
 
bossinthe831
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by carumba10
Yes, I agree BSPNs coverage is BS, and TO isn't as bad as they say.


Actually, I know Chris Dauman personally... a former SF 49ers Center in the 90's... has a super bowl ring and everything. I asked him what T.O is like in real life and I'll quote you his response... "exactly how you hear about, and see him on T.V" then he proceeded to give me a disgusted look at even bring up TO. I usually agree that "BSPN" overblows things, but my friend disagrees in this case so I'll side with him.... back on topic though.

Go to guy is a horrible VP imo... if 1 WR gets it, then another has to get it to keep up. Soon your whole receiving core has 15 in it and now everyone wasted 15 VP's at an equal chance at having the ball go to them. Pretty stupid.

The only exception would be what mewelde said.. but even then it's a stretch.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.