User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > North American Pro League > USA Conference > Remember...if you are going to gut...
Page:
 
lawdawg95
offline
Link
 
So I'm guessing that we have a shot at being in next season?


By my understanding, after the 8 semi-finalists are brought up then Wolfpack go by their 16-0 record, then we're 14-2 with one playoff and two scrimmage wins ?
 
cwrujosh
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by lawdawg95
So I'm guessing that we have a shot at being in next season?


By my understanding, after the 8 semi-finalists are brought up then Wolfpack go by their 16-0 record, then we're 14-2 with one playoff and two scrimmage wins ?


The new sort order is:

1. Number of playoff victories
2. Number of playoff games participated in (this covers the first round losers over the non playoff teams)
3. Regular season wins
4. Regular season ties
5. Regular season points scored
6. Regular season points against (lower is better)
7. Postseason scrimmage wins (not friendlies)
8. Postseason scrimmage ties (not friendlies)
9. Avg playoff game points differential
10. Avg postseason scrimmage points differential
11. Avg playoff points scored
12. Avg postseason scrimmage points scored
13. Avg playoff points allowed (lower is better)
14. Avg postseason scrimmages points allowed (lower is better)
15. Random selection.
 
Galkuris
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by lawdawg95
Yeah, 2 CBs and 2 LBs ain't gonna cut it in the pros. Especially with only 1 SS and 1 FS.

We have 7 LBs on roster and I'm worried that won't be enough if we make it to Pro and want to carry 7 CBs as well.


7 CBs? Really? Why exactly would you want to do that? (Honest question, 7 makes absolutely no sense to me, 6 I can see)

--Same with 8 LBs, I have enough trouble getting 6 of them all over 25 plays from a 4-3.

Last edited Feb 11, 2009 14:58:09
 
joemiken
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by packers0491
just a heads up things arent looking good for the rage right now. I dont plan on gutting but i may not have a choice...


For all the headaches you guys gave us, I always loved playing you guys.
 
lawdawg95
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Galkuris
Originally posted by lawdawg95

Yeah, 2 CBs and 2 LBs ain't gonna cut it in the pros. Especially with only 1 SS and 1 FS.

We have 7 LBs on roster and I'm worried that won't be enough if we make it to Pro and want to carry 7 CBs as well.


7 CBs? Really? Why exactly would you want to do that? (Honest question, 7 makes absolutely no sense to me, 6 I can see)

--Same with 8 LBs, I have enough trouble getting 6 of them all over 25 plays from a 4-3.



One CB would likely be the primary KR/PR and CB4/CB5
 
joemiken
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by lawdawg95
One CB would likely be the primary KR/PR and CB4/CB5


Cincy carried 6 last season and it took a few games to get our energy settings to the point where everyone got max xp.
 
jktooley
offline
Link
 
Yeah... I likes some depth, but 6 is pushing the issue... however, if that 6th guy was considering a rival, i'd love to have him!
 
Galkuris
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jktooley
Yeah... I likes some depth, but 6 is pushing the issue... however, if that 6th guy was considering a rival, i'd love to have him!


Ya, but he is considering 7 not 6. And 8 LBs. You likely won't be getting max XP for all those guys, and honestly the energy gain is so slim it probably doesn't matter.
 
lawdawg95
offline
Link
 
Yeah, we'll roll with just 7
 
The Duff Man
offline
Link
 
I used 6, with the last guy being the KR and PRer. He rarely saw any playing time at CB.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.