I have not had the time to make predictions so..
Good game LV, my secondary killed you guys
Good game LV, my secondary killed you guys
sicarius
offline
offline
GG USMC.
2 fumbled kicks, one that went back for a TD, and quite possibly the worst combined QB performance I've ever seen. 26/67 & 6 INTs? Yikes!
2 fumbled kicks, one that went back for a TD, and quite possibly the worst combined QB performance I've ever seen. 26/67 & 6 INTs? Yikes!
wrkarl
offline
offline
Originally posted by artec
I have not had the time to make predictions so..
Good game LV, my secondary killed you guys
Understatement. GG.
I have not had the time to make predictions so..
Good game LV, my secondary killed you guys
Understatement. GG.
foppa9601
offline
offline
Originally posted by sicarius
GG USMC.
2 fumbled kicks, one that went back for a TD, and quite possibly the worst combined QB performance I've ever seen. 26/67 & 6 INTs? Yikes!
I hope both you guys keep that up against us (and we don't) - Looking forward to our game with both you guys!
GG USMC.
2 fumbled kicks, one that went back for a TD, and quite possibly the worst combined QB performance I've ever seen. 26/67 & 6 INTs? Yikes!
I hope both you guys keep that up against us (and we don't) - Looking forward to our game with both you guys!
Baustin
offline
offline
Originally posted by sicarius
GG USMC.
2 fumbled kicks, one that went back for a TD, and quite possibly the worst combined QB performance I've ever seen. 26/67 & 6 INTs? Yikes!
That was ugly, and it certainly didn't help my already surly disposition any. When our DT's have 3 PD's in one game something's screwy.
Good game, pretty even, but you won the turnover battle.
I'm not sure what to think about the fumbles. Our return man has 40+ carrying and points in cover up, not to mention decent strength, which is usually the other issue.
GG USMC.
2 fumbled kicks, one that went back for a TD, and quite possibly the worst combined QB performance I've ever seen. 26/67 & 6 INTs? Yikes!
That was ugly, and it certainly didn't help my already surly disposition any. When our DT's have 3 PD's in one game something's screwy.
Good game, pretty even, but you won the turnover battle.
I'm not sure what to think about the fumbles. Our return man has 40+ carrying and points in cover up, not to mention decent strength, which is usually the other issue.
Mr Sinister
offline
offline
All I have to say is 2 things:
GG USMC, you had us beat, but we were a little luckier with the turnovers.
And
Thank God Bort hasn't put in a 2pt conversion.
GG USMC, you had us beat, but we were a little luckier with the turnovers.
And
Thank God Bort hasn't put in a 2pt conversion.
sicarius
offline
offline
Originally posted by Baustin
That was ugly, and it certainly didn't help my already surly disposition any. When our DT's have 3 PD's in one game something's screwy.
Not to mention Brogan Thorr getting one of your INTs in a coverage drop.
Originally posted by baustin
I'm not sure what to think about the fumbles. Our return man has 40+ carrying and points in cover up, not to mention decent strength, which is usually the other issue.
It just goes to show you don't mess with our RBs (they forced the fumbles). They're a scary, scary group! But yeah, I was pretty surprised to see 2 fumbled returns, especially after you seemed so high on the new returner.
That was ugly, and it certainly didn't help my already surly disposition any. When our DT's have 3 PD's in one game something's screwy.
Not to mention Brogan Thorr getting one of your INTs in a coverage drop.
Originally posted by baustin
I'm not sure what to think about the fumbles. Our return man has 40+ carrying and points in cover up, not to mention decent strength, which is usually the other issue.
It just goes to show you don't mess with our RBs (they forced the fumbles). They're a scary, scary group! But yeah, I was pretty surprised to see 2 fumbled returns, especially after you seemed so high on the new returner.
Sequtugh
offline
offline
GG Houghton, we just couldn't get anything going against you guys. I might have to re-evaluate y'all as the #3, it might be higher. I'll know after the next game 
jplee
offline
offline
Originally posted by Sequtugh
GG Houghton, we just couldn't get anything going against you guys. I might have to re-evaluate y'all as the #3, it might be higher. I'll know after the next game
Huzzah - right back at ya.
I will have to see if I can sober up our o-line before Mason has a season ending injury.
GG Houghton, we just couldn't get anything going against you guys. I might have to re-evaluate y'all as the #3, it might be higher. I'll know after the next game
Huzzah - right back at ya.
I will have to see if I can sober up our o-line before Mason has a season ending injury.
LordMortis
offline
offline
^^^^
and fuzzball are doing all the planning and working some sort of VooDoo. I won't complain nor ask about the chickens in the locker room.
I'm sure we'll see the Wolves in the Playoffs and somehow I think your offense will do better by then.
and fuzzball are doing all the planning and working some sort of VooDoo. I won't complain nor ask about the chickens in the locker room.
I'm sure we'll see the Wolves in the Playoffs and somehow I think your offense will do better by then.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
