Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Husker Nation
I don't know...Having 1 LB to back up all 4 LB positions by himself...That drains your guys...


Yeah. 6 is about ideal for a 4-3 I think. But this is coming from a guy who's defense is down to 3 LBs. 5 sounds like one hell of a luxary. lol

Well, it looks like the deal for the level 39 LB and level 37 CB is going to go through...Can't wait for that to be finalized...

Originally posted by Husker Nation
Well, it looks like the deal for the level 39 LB and level 37 CB is going to go through...Can't wait for that to be finalized...

I look forward to it when we see each other again Husker

I understand about linebackers better now. Big Money taught me that goin up against a few great ones can put you on yer ear.

I have 5, and only 1 is over level 11. My D is pretty much anchored at 4-3, and with the advice, I think I'll go get that 6th LB now.

*rolls up a new guy*



Jack the Pirate

LBs have become like gold ever since Bort introduced the 3-4 alignment as an option.

they are huge, it seems, if you have enough of them. I dunno though. Strong 4-3 rush can do many things against a running team. against a passing team, if the rush aint strong enough, 3-4 could rule.

If I had a team, big if, in the 35ish range with a 4-3 rush that just wasnt cuttin the mustard, 3-4 would be what I'd work on.

Just rambling now. I do like the changes they've put in, even since I've been on board. I love this game.

Jack the Pirate

I'm not advocating the 3-4 over the 4-3. I'm just saying that having the option to run the 3-4 increased demand and helped create a shortage at the LB position.

Both definitely have their advantages. We dont run a 3-4 yet, but I can see situations so far that would make a 3-4 advantageous.

*rolls up another linebacker!*

Jack