Originally posted by notthegint
This.
It's become painfully clear he stills thinks we need 15 man rosters.
22 man roster would be perfect.
This.
It's become painfully clear he stills thinks we need 15 man rosters.
22 man roster would be perfect.
Originally posted by edwardwscollins
20 man roster would be perfect.
FYP
20 man roster would be perfect.
FYP
Larry Roadgrader
offline
offline
Somebody needs to get the word to Bort that we'd be quite happy with 20 man rosters--there's nearly unanimous agreement on this point throughout the latter half of the thread. So we're suggesting ONE coding to change to the base game--reduce roster size to 20, period.
dmfa41
offline
offline
Originally posted by Larry Roadgrader
Somebody needs to get the word to Bort that we'd be quite happy with 20 man rosters--there's nearly unanimous agreement on this point throughout the latter half of the thread. So we're suggesting ONE coding to change to the base game--reduce roster size to 20, period.
That's easier than the current coding for Pee Wee teams, I think.
Somebody needs to get the word to Bort that we'd be quite happy with 20 man rosters--there's nearly unanimous agreement on this point throughout the latter half of the thread. So we're suggesting ONE coding to change to the base game--reduce roster size to 20, period.
That's easier than the current coding for Pee Wee teams, I think.
notthegint
offline
offline
Originally posted by Larry Roadgrader
Somebody needs to get the word to Bort that we'd be quite happy with 20 man rosters--there's nearly unanimous agreement on this point throughout the latter half of the thread. So we're suggesting ONE coding to change to the base game--reduce roster size to 20, period.
Originally posted by notthegint
Does Bort know that 20 man rosters would be fine for an Iron Man League?
(Responses from him seem to indicate he still thinks we're demanding 15, which is what he said the technical problem was with.)
Originally posted by EllisBell
This is probably a question that is better suited for Bort, he will be at the Q&A in two weeks if he doesn't clarify it before then
Short of calling Bort out on the forums in GLB Main, this seems like our best bet.
Somebody needs to get the word to Bort that we'd be quite happy with 20 man rosters--there's nearly unanimous agreement on this point throughout the latter half of the thread. So we're suggesting ONE coding to change to the base game--reduce roster size to 20, period.
Originally posted by notthegint
Does Bort know that 20 man rosters would be fine for an Iron Man League?
(Responses from him seem to indicate he still thinks we're demanding 15, which is what he said the technical problem was with.)
Originally posted by EllisBell
This is probably a question that is better suited for Bort, he will be at the Q&A in two weeks if he doesn't clarify it before then
Short of calling Bort out on the forums in GLB Main, this seems like our best bet.
Edited by notthegint on Feb 18, 2010 14:59:29
notthegint
offline
offline
Originally posted by CONN CHRIS
Has anyone pre-submitted this question?
I have, and I'd bet several others have too.
Has anyone pre-submitted this question?
I have, and I'd bet several others have too.
LionsLover
offline
offline
Originally posted by haole
Originally posted by edwardwscollins
15 man roster would be perfect.
FYP
FYP
Originally posted by edwardwscollins
15 man roster would be perfect.
FYP
FYP
LionsLover
offline
offline
Originally posted by dmfa41
Originally posted by Larry Roadgrader
Somebody needs to get the word to Bort that we'd be quite happy with 20 man rosters--there's nearly unanimous agreement on this point throughout the latter half of the thread. So we're suggesting ONE coding to change to the base game--reduce roster size to 20, period.
That's easier than the current coding for Pee Wee teams, I think.
Edit: Actually, come to think of it, 20 DOES NOT WORK 8 offensive players, 8 defensive players 3 both way players and a K/P? Seriously 3 BWP? That's not an iron man league. A true IML would only have 12 roster spots, 15 being decent.
Originally posted by Larry Roadgrader
Somebody needs to get the word to Bort that we'd be quite happy with 20 man rosters--there's nearly unanimous agreement on this point throughout the latter half of the thread. So we're suggesting ONE coding to change to the base game--reduce roster size to 20, period.
That's easier than the current coding for Pee Wee teams, I think.
Edit: Actually, come to think of it, 20 DOES NOT WORK 8 offensive players, 8 defensive players 3 both way players and a K/P? Seriously 3 BWP? That's not an iron man league. A true IML would only have 12 roster spots, 15 being decent.
Edited by LionsLover on Feb 21, 2010 12:21:30
crashsnipe
offline
offline
Originally posted by Johnnyboyfo
Very good idea
Why isnt this in epic yet/
it was for a while but then was taken out
Very good idea
Why isnt this in epic yet/
it was for a while but then was taken out
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
