Wow. Pretty convincing. 1 First Down in the 2nd half for DDL.
dontmeswidme
offline
offline
Originally posted by Jed
Originally posted by tjking82
EDIT: Pushovers DL is also awesome. Those two are far and away best IMO.
Yea, and see if you can pick out the common thread
Originally posted by tjking82
EDIT: Pushovers DL is also awesome. Those two are far and away best IMO.
Yea, and see if you can pick out the common thread
SteelersInsider
offline
offline
Originally posted by Ming Sao
Wow. Pretty convincing. 1 First Down in the 2nd half for DDL.
Not really that convincing because 1 score would have won the game until there was 2 minutes left.
Maybe a convincing DEFENSIVE performance, but Harper's offense wasn't.
Very good game and it will be interesting to see where they boost.
I'm guessing both teams go heavy on jumping and confidence....
Wow. Pretty convincing. 1 First Down in the 2nd half for DDL.
Not really that convincing because 1 score would have won the game until there was 2 minutes left.
Maybe a convincing DEFENSIVE performance, but Harper's offense wasn't.
Very good game and it will be interesting to see where they boost.
I'm guessing both teams go heavy on jumping and confidence....
Tikker
offline
offline
Originally posted by SteelersInsider
Not really that convincing because 1 score would have won the game until there was 2 minutes left.
with their non-existant running game, and almost non-existant passing game there wasn't going to be a comeback
I don't think the score was reflective of how bad they got wtfpwned
4 int's were the only thing that kept it from being a slaughter
Not really that convincing because 1 score would have won the game until there was 2 minutes left.
with their non-existant running game, and almost non-existant passing game there wasn't going to be a comeback
I don't think the score was reflective of how bad they got wtfpwned
4 int's were the only thing that kept it from being a slaughter
papabear
offline
offline
Originally posted by Tikker
Originally posted by SteelersInsider
Not really that convincing because 1 score would have won the game until there was 2 minutes left.
with their non-existant running game, and almost non-existant passing game there wasn't going to be a comeback
I don't think the score was reflective of how bad they got wtfpwned
4 int's were the only thing that kept it from being a slaughter
not to be a jerk, but who are you and where does your "insight" into a pro game come from? At the end of a game, stats may be impressive, but if you got 400 yards rushing and still eneded up with a L, then does it really matter? Last I check how they define a win, is who has more points when the clock runs out.
That being said, not to start a troll sprawl, it was a good game for both teams, we both picked up some much needed information for what will be a great playoff run, and possible showdown.
Originally posted by SteelersInsider
Not really that convincing because 1 score would have won the game until there was 2 minutes left.
with their non-existant running game, and almost non-existant passing game there wasn't going to be a comeback
I don't think the score was reflective of how bad they got wtfpwned
4 int's were the only thing that kept it from being a slaughter
not to be a jerk, but who are you and where does your "insight" into a pro game come from? At the end of a game, stats may be impressive, but if you got 400 yards rushing and still eneded up with a L, then does it really matter? Last I check how they define a win, is who has more points when the clock runs out.
That being said, not to start a troll sprawl, it was a good game for both teams, we both picked up some much needed information for what will be a great playoff run, and possible showdown.
Judan
offline
offline
Kind of a fluke game, really. 15 sacks? Let's be real...
The RNG favored the Mustangs in that particular game. In the Playoffs, let's hope the pendulum swings the other way.
The RNG favored the Mustangs in that particular game. In the Playoffs, let's hope the pendulum swings the other way.
dontmeswidme
offline
offline
Originally posted by Doc
Kind of a fluke game, really. 15 sacks? Let's be real...
The RNG favored the Mustangs in that particular game. In the Playoffs, let's hope the pendulum swings the other way.
15 sacks? that's what Law Jackson and MoD do to qbs.
Kind of a fluke game, really. 15 sacks? Let's be real...
The RNG favored the Mustangs in that particular game. In the Playoffs, let's hope the pendulum swings the other way.
15 sacks? that's what Law Jackson and MoD do to qbs.
Sam Bolster
offline
offline
Originally posted by Doc
Kind of a fluke game, really. 15 sacks? Let's be real...
The RNG favored the Mustangs in that particular game. In the Playoffs, let's hope the pendulum swings the other way.
You obviously do not know who Law-Jack and MoD are. I mean have you ever seen any of there other games. They destroys teams. Usually it is a lot more hurries then sacks but it seems like this game they got to your QB every time.
Kind of a fluke game, really. 15 sacks? Let's be real...
The RNG favored the Mustangs in that particular game. In the Playoffs, let's hope the pendulum swings the other way.
You obviously do not know who Law-Jack and MoD are. I mean have you ever seen any of there other games. They destroys teams. Usually it is a lot more hurries then sacks but it seems like this game they got to your QB every time.
The Strategy Expert
offline
offline
Originally posted by dontmeswidme
Originally posted by Doc
Kind of a fluke game, really. 15 sacks? Let's be real...
The RNG favored the Mustangs in that particular game. In the Playoffs, let's hope the pendulum swings the other way.
15 sacks? that's what Law Jackson and MoD do to qbs.
They are good players, but LJ's average sacks per game in all of the other games this year isn't close to how he performed in this one.
Originally posted by Doc
Kind of a fluke game, really. 15 sacks? Let's be real...
The RNG favored the Mustangs in that particular game. In the Playoffs, let's hope the pendulum swings the other way.
15 sacks? that's what Law Jackson and MoD do to qbs.
They are good players, but LJ's average sacks per game in all of the other games this year isn't close to how he performed in this one.
FairForever
offline
offline
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Originally posted by dontmeswidme
Originally posted by Doc
Kind of a fluke game, really. 15 sacks? Let's be real...
The RNG favored the Mustangs in that particular game. In the Playoffs, let's hope the pendulum swings the other way.
15 sacks? that's what Law Jackson and MoD do to qbs.
They are good players, but LJ's average sacks per game in all of the other games this year isn't close to how he performed in this one.
Our D seems to step it up in big games.
Last season, regular season meeting between an unboosted Mustangs and a boosted Pushovers team... Mustangs win as Nicholas Raine gets 4 interceptions en route to winning the interception trophy for USA Pro.
Oh, and average sacks per game is hardly a good indicator. Against the gutted teams, the Mustangs are rarely ever on defense (due to fumbles and interceptions and 3-and-outs).
Originally posted by dontmeswidme
Originally posted by Doc
Kind of a fluke game, really. 15 sacks? Let's be real...
The RNG favored the Mustangs in that particular game. In the Playoffs, let's hope the pendulum swings the other way.
15 sacks? that's what Law Jackson and MoD do to qbs.
They are good players, but LJ's average sacks per game in all of the other games this year isn't close to how he performed in this one.
Our D seems to step it up in big games.
Last season, regular season meeting between an unboosted Mustangs and a boosted Pushovers team... Mustangs win as Nicholas Raine gets 4 interceptions en route to winning the interception trophy for USA Pro.
Oh, and average sacks per game is hardly a good indicator. Against the gutted teams, the Mustangs are rarely ever on defense (due to fumbles and interceptions and 3-and-outs).
The Strategy Expert
offline
offline
Originally posted by FairForever
Oh, and average sacks per game is hardly a good indicator. Against the gutted teams, the Mustangs are rarely ever on defense (due to fumbles and interceptions and 3-and-outs).
In our game the Mustangs Offense ran like about 90 plays to our 60, roughly 1.5 times as many, so their defense wasn't on the field all that much, and LJ had 8 sacks.
Let's take a couple of these blowout games, against Miami it was 100 to 55 in plays, but LJ had only 1 sack.
Mozilla, 90 to 80 plays, yet LJ had zero sacks.
Oh, and average sacks per game is hardly a good indicator. Against the gutted teams, the Mustangs are rarely ever on defense (due to fumbles and interceptions and 3-and-outs).
In our game the Mustangs Offense ran like about 90 plays to our 60, roughly 1.5 times as many, so their defense wasn't on the field all that much, and LJ had 8 sacks.
Let's take a couple of these blowout games, against Miami it was 100 to 55 in plays, but LJ had only 1 sack.
Mozilla, 90 to 80 plays, yet LJ had zero sacks.
Last edited Jul 4, 2008 13:38:54
FairForever
offline
offline
Originally posted by dontmeswidme
it also has to do with tactics...
No it doesn't.
it also has to do with tactics...
No it doesn't.
McGrai37
offline
offline
Maybe it was an issue with your OTs. I'm sure some builds matchup better against others.
dontmeswidme
offline
offline
Originally posted by FairForever
Originally posted by dontmeswidme
it also has to do with tactics...
No it doesn't.
if a team throws more short passes, then the ball will get out of the qbs hand faster.
if a team throws more medium/long passes, then the ball will get out of the qbs hand lower which allows DEs to have more time to get to the qb.
Originally posted by dontmeswidme
it also has to do with tactics...
No it doesn't.
if a team throws more short passes, then the ball will get out of the qbs hand faster.
if a team throws more medium/long passes, then the ball will get out of the qbs hand lower which allows DEs to have more time to get to the qb.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
