Originally posted by Time Trial
For sure. People want GLB2 to fail because (a) they don't think that the market can support both games; and (b) they want Bort to come home and love them.
duh I want 2.0 to fail now because I have 0 to no interest in it. I tried it and would rather 1.0. You are right I don't believe 1.0 and 2.0 can both be supported. 1.0 may not survive, but who knows how long the run of 2.0 will be either. I agree Bort won't be back so your and b section is pretty ridiculously stupid I am assuming as well.
Originally posted by Time Trial
Since the new game was advertised to old GLB1 players via email blast, it brought a lot of people back to the game who hadn't visited a WG game in years.
I don't think you can count most of those as having "come back"...........but point taken. Really poor logic though.
Originally posted by Time Trial
Bort's not coming back. When GLB2 no longer needs his full attention, he'll be working on the next WG project.
Am I to assume it won't be another damn football game? We were assured it wouldn't be and yet here we are. Should he splinter the user base again? I doubt there will be something new outside of football any time soon and I expect 3.0 is already in works.. :/Sarcasm:
Originally posted by Time Trial
Bort isn't the kind of person to dump a project he's spent so much time on like GLB2. That game could have 50 users and he would work on it until he was happy with it. But when he's done, he's looking forward, not backward.
LOL I present to you GLB "Classic." Really, you make this too easy.
Originally posted by Time Trial
Well, obviously this thread is 8+ pages of "your statement is a lie."
Technically there is very little that is negative directly about 2.0 but much that has been said positive for 1.0 in this thread so really you should understand half of what is going on before you call someone a liar. Actually you have spent more time calling us out for "not giving the game a fair shake" than anything else. I have my opinion of the new game, and I don't care for it. You love it or bort one.. perhaps it is lust who knows.
Originally posted by Time Trial
I don't think you know what paraphrasing means. What you did is to take my main idea, reverse it, and then attribute it back to me.
I don't think you know what sarcasm means. What you did there is completely miss his point, reverse it and misunderstood the attributions of his statement.
:/troll:
For sure. People want GLB2 to fail because (a) they don't think that the market can support both games; and (b) they want Bort to come home and love them.
duh I want 2.0 to fail now because I have 0 to no interest in it. I tried it and would rather 1.0. You are right I don't believe 1.0 and 2.0 can both be supported. 1.0 may not survive, but who knows how long the run of 2.0 will be either. I agree Bort won't be back so your and b section is pretty ridiculously stupid I am assuming as well.
Originally posted by Time Trial
Since the new game was advertised to old GLB1 players via email blast, it brought a lot of people back to the game who hadn't visited a WG game in years.
I don't think you can count most of those as having "come back"...........but point taken. Really poor logic though.
Originally posted by Time Trial
Bort's not coming back. When GLB2 no longer needs his full attention, he'll be working on the next WG project.
Am I to assume it won't be another damn football game? We were assured it wouldn't be and yet here we are. Should he splinter the user base again? I doubt there will be something new outside of football any time soon and I expect 3.0 is already in works.. :/Sarcasm:
Originally posted by Time Trial
Bort isn't the kind of person to dump a project he's spent so much time on like GLB2. That game could have 50 users and he would work on it until he was happy with it. But when he's done, he's looking forward, not backward.
LOL I present to you GLB "Classic." Really, you make this too easy.
Originally posted by Time Trial
Well, obviously this thread is 8+ pages of "your statement is a lie."
Technically there is very little that is negative directly about 2.0 but much that has been said positive for 1.0 in this thread so really you should understand half of what is going on before you call someone a liar. Actually you have spent more time calling us out for "not giving the game a fair shake" than anything else. I have my opinion of the new game, and I don't care for it. You love it or bort one.. perhaps it is lust who knows.
Originally posted by Time Trial
I don't think you know what paraphrasing means. What you did is to take my main idea, reverse it, and then attribute it back to me.
I don't think you know what sarcasm means. What you did there is completely miss his point, reverse it and misunderstood the attributions of his statement.
:/troll:






























