Warrior General Games

Originally posted by dahman32
This actually sounds like what mods do in the suggestion forum in general anyway
"NO FURTHER DISCUSSION "



suggestion forum really isnt a discussion forum. take this thread for example. if it were in suggestions i would have locked it up long ago because its ngth. if something is ngth there really is no discussion needed since all the discussion ends up being is "bort hates the game because he wont add my suggestion."

Originally posted by bhall43
suggestion forum really isnt a discussion forum. take this thread for example. if it were in suggestions i would have locked it up long ago because its ngth. if something is ngth there really is no discussion needed since all the discussion ends up being is "bort hates the game because he wont add my suggestion."

With over 10 locked threads on page 1 in this forum (GLB Main), one could make the claim that this really isn't a discussion forum either

I'd like a draft, but I'll take a bottle instead if it is something tasty.

Originally posted by Team Nucleus
Any who, people have always had negetives to say about doin a draft but when they are done majority of those entering are excited about it.

I am fine with you having drafts I just think that it should be up to the participants if they want to take part in it. not like your idea where everyone is forced to be part of it. and no I am not trying to get your thread locked or anything like that. I just think that if you suggest something like having a draft you should try to look at everyones opinions and not just your own.

Originally posted by bhall43
suggestion forum really isnt a discussion forum. take this thread for example. if it were in suggestions i would have locked it up long ago because its ngth. if something is ngth there really is no discussion needed since all the discussion ends up being is "bort hates the game because he wont add my suggestion."

That's very true....I already know Bort/GLB won't support a Draft but they have allowed user run drafts in the past and there's nothing to stop it...A draft is just another option agents can use much like the free agent market.
Who wouldn't want to see if their own dot gets selected with the 1st pick in Round 1? (well a few hate everything)

this isnt ffa. if you want to post nonsense then there are places to do so. if you want to discuss glb2 there are more than enough threads up to do so.

Originally posted by hatchman
I am fine with you having drafts I just think that it should be up to the participants if they want to take part in it. not like your idea where everyone is forced to be part of it. and no I am not trying to get your thread locked or anything like that. I just think that if you suggest something like having a draft you should try to look at everyones opinions and not just your own.

You obviously are mis-reading or just trolling

Originally posted by hatchman
I am fine with you having drafts I just think that it should be up to the participants if they want to take part in it. not like your idea where everyone is forced to be part of it. and no I am not trying to get your thread locked or anything like that. I just think that if you suggest something like having a draft you should try to look at everyones opinions and not just your own.

Originally posted by dahman32
I think it would work this way.

New teams would only be afforded this option as it would help fill in their roster.
Agents would be able (as an option) to check which players they would offer up for drafting.

Concept #1
Team's contract offers would expire in 2 days so the process would not take long as offers would be accepted with more haste.

Concept #2
Instant signing with sequential draft picks. Similar to fantasy drafts, teams would chart their picks from most wanted on downwards and the 1st team gets 1st dibs of course. Agents have to do nothing as their players would be signed automatically within this system and without any reason for these teams not to have a decent full roster afterwards...

TN, we will add this to the drawing board regardless.



This is somewhere near the 1st page of the OP

Originally posted by Team Nucleus
That's very true....I already know Bort/GLB won't support a Draft but they have allowed user run drafts in the past and there's nothing to stop it...A draft is just another option agents can use much like the free agent market.
Who wouldn't want to see if their own dot gets selected with the 1st pick in Round 1? (well a few hate everything)


as hatch said. a user supported draft is fine for the fun of having a draft i guess. a draft in which people are forced into in a game like this is just sort of useless and would be best automated if done.

Originally posted by bhall43
as hatch said. a user supported draft is fine for the fun of having a draft i guess. a draft in which people are forced into in a game like this is just sort of useless and would be best automated if done.

Nobody or any post states anyone is forced to do anything...What are you guys reading?

Originally posted by Team Nucleus
You obviously are mis-reading or just trolling

No I am not trolling at all. I just think you aren't looking at all aspects of this idea. but it is clear you aren't open to trying to openly discuss the idea and the Pros and Cons. so I will stop wasting time with it.

A draft is voluntary and always has been

Originally posted by Team Nucleus
Nobody or any post states anyone is forced to do anything...What are you guys reading?

there were some posts a while back that eluded to a GLB wide draft. where people would have to offer up 1 of their free players for a draft. maybe it wasn't you or Dahman that made the post because I do not remember who did. but the idea was mentioned.

Originally posted by Novus
Took me 5 seconds to come up with a way to exploit this, and I'm sure people far more clever and devious than me would be even better at doing so.

Plus, it's also basically just a variation on the ol' NGTH Suggestions of "Give us more free Flex!" and "Give us more free players!" Call it a draft if you want, but that's still what it is.

It would be that no doubt about it.

Originally posted by hatchman
there were some posts a while back that eluded to a GLB wide draft. where people would have to offer up 1 of their free players for a draft. maybe it wasn't you or Dahman that made the post because I do not remember who did. but the idea was mentioned.

So put your comments in that thread instead...since this one doesn't force anyone to do anything