Warrior General Games

Originally posted by ghuffman
fwiw...i could make a blitzing LB WL mvp if i wanted to.

It's really not that difficult.



Originally posted by Bane
You realize that is easily scouted?

Ok? Just like a blitzing lb'er, and what situations he comes in on can be scouted as well. Its all relative. Either way, this is nothing but a whine thread. One person wants LB'ers to be better at blitzing, when we all know if it happens everybody else is gonna cry about them being overpowered. Just play the fucking game, and if one things isnt working particualrly well, then DONT DO IT. If DE's are having more success than LB'ers, then use the DE's and get LB's to play coverage. Im just saying the OP needs to stop being a fucking scrub, and get over himself.

Originally posted by Jay89
Ok? Just like a blitzing lb'er, and what situations he comes in on can be scouted as well. Its all relative. Either way, this is nothing but a whine thread. One person wants LB'ers to be better at blitzing, when we all know if it happens everybody else is gonna cry about them being overpowered. Just play the fucking game, and if one things isnt working particualrly well, then DONT DO IT. If DE's are having more success than LB'ers, then use the DE's and get LB's to play coverage. Im just saying the OP needs to stop being a fucking scrub, and get over himself.

Im not pushing for it to be overpowered. i just want it to be a valid option for the Defense.

Originally posted by bamastrac
Im not pushing for it to be overpowered. i just want it to be a valid option for the Defense.

But how is it NOT a valid option? Hell ive only DC'd for about 4 seasons, and nobody taught me anything. Im just "Whinging" it, and int he past 4 seasons i have had at least 7 or 8 LB'ers hit double digit Sacks. Which imo is plenty. Would it be awesome if they got 50 sacks a season? Sure. But its just NGTH

Originally posted by Jay89
"Whinging" it



Ofcourse the idiot itt doesn't want another viable option to produce defensive sacks.

Originally posted by jampysos


Ofcourse the idiot itt doesn't want another viable option to produce defensive sacks.

What im saying is ive DC'd 2 teams for 4 season. LB's have accounted for around 40% of the overall team sacks, which to me seems like plenty.

Originally posted by Jay89
But how is it NOT a valid option? Hell ive only DC'd for about 4 seasons, and nobody taught me anything. Im just "Whinging" it, and int he past 4 seasons i have had at least 7 or 8 LB'ers hit double digit Sacks. Which imo is plenty. Would it be awesome if they got 50 sacks a season? Sure. But its just NGTH

Post it or it didnt happen and your definitely exaggerating on what i am pushing for.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2417822&pbp_id=23112

there you go Kop, get this to happen more

Originally posted by B1G
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2417822&pbp_id=23112

there you go Kop, get this to happen more

lol that doesnt look right at all. of course i am talking about edge blitzes not gap blitzes