Warrior General Games

Originally posted by yello1
Originally posted by Guppy, Inc


he acts like 2% is this HUGE factor. 2% off of 48 isnt even a full point, and even at 70 its only 1.4 pts. hell, thats less difference than most bad builds compared to good builds.



Okay so you are in the "Chemistry is irrelevant" camp then.

I agree

Lets get rid of chemistry, it doesn't do anything.

Another +1 to Removing Chemistry from the game completely.

LOL you guys are frakking amusing how completely incapable you are of forming cogent thoughts.

it is funny how everyone is wrong except you I think you need to take a long honest look in the mirror and see that you are the problem with your teams. It isn't the game that is holding your teams back from having success it is you as a owner that is letting your teams down.

Originally posted by yello1
Okay so you are in the "Chemistry is irrelevant" camp then.

I agree

Lets get rid of chemistry, it doesn't do anything.

Another +1 to Removing Chemistry from the game completely.

LOL you guys are frakking amusing how completely incapable you are of forming cogent thoughts.

you are the idiot that cant seem to grasp that chemistry is supposed to be the small factor that it is. it is NOT the HUGE factor that you keep claiming that it is. Good builds and tactics can easily overcome chemistry deficiencies. but if you suck at tactics, and have bad builds, AND bad chemistry, then yes, you will lose.

Originally posted by yello1
yeah, I own all those other teams with low chemistry in OPro and World League.

its all about me.

and yet we dont see those owners whining about it. you cant claim to be speaking for others when you have no proof that any of them agree with you. YOU see issues where the teams you claim to represent dont complain. it all comes back to YOUR teams suck, so you look for teams teams in similar situations and ASSUME they agree with you.

we've all been in the chemistry pinch at one point or another, but we dealt with it. you just whine about it instead of learning how to compensate for it. from what i've seen of your teams, your builds and tactics both suck, so even if you had 100 chem and played a team with 10, my money, and i'd bet the majority of other people's, would be on the other team in most cases.

Originally posted by yello1
yeah, I own all those other teams with low chemistry in OPro and World League.

its all about me.

They're not here complaining--only you. Thus proving that this suggestion, like all of your others, is just another attempt on your part to bail you out for not understanding how the game works.

funny thing 9 pages on this suggestion and the actual suggestion had 6 +1s is all and if I am not mistaken most of those were from the coalition Yello1 belongs to. I may be wrong but I think atleast a few are in the same group.

Originally posted by hatchman
funny thing 9 pages on this suggestion and the actual suggestion had 6 +1s is all and if I am not mistaken most of those were from the coalition Yello1 belongs to. I may be wrong but I think atleast a few are in the same group.

tell me that there arent people so clueless that they'd be lead by yello?

Originally posted by hatchman
funny thing 9 pages on this suggestion and the actual suggestion had 6 +1s is all and if I am not mistaken most of those were from the coalition Yello1 belongs to. I may be wrong but I think atleast a few are in the same group.

No none of them were from any of my contacts.

Just folks of wisdom and learning.

Originally posted by Larry Roadgrader
They're not here complaining--only you. Thus proving that this suggestion, like all of your others, is just another attempt on your part to bail you out for not understanding how the game works.

Yeah, I am sure they have a celebratory party going on in their forums about how happy they are to have 14 Chemistry.

Or maybe they just said WTF this blows and are off playing another game and on their way to quitting GLB.

Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
and yet we dont see those owners whining about it. you cant claim to be speaking for others when you have no proof that any of them agree with you. YOU see issues where the teams you claim to represent dont complain. it all comes back to YOUR teams suck, so you look for teams teams in similar situations and ASSUME they agree with you.

we've all been in the chemistry pinch at one point or another, but we dealt with it. you just whine about it instead of learning how to compensate for it. from what i've seen of your teams, your builds and tactics both suck, so even if you had 100 chem and played a team with 10, my money, and i'd bet the majority of other people's, would be on the other team in most cases.

Guppy I ask you again

If a 2-9% change to team performance over ten games is small

Why is the 1% game promotion limited to two uses per season?

Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
we've all been in the chemistry pinch at one point or another, but we dealt with it. .

Only because your limited intellect fails to grasp that this game is in BETA and that every game feature should be assessed and suggestions made to adjust it if its nonsensical or over powered or bad for the game over all.

Chemistry is all three.

Your luddite herd mind may not realize it, or be capable of imagining something better, but mine is.

And so I post.

Meanwhile, Guppy swims around happily in his own toilet water and tells us its just the way it should be.

Originally posted by yello1
Guppy I ask you again

If a 2-9% change to team performance over ten games is small

Why is the 1% game promotion limited to two uses per season?

no one said 9% is small. i said 2% is small. I know, reading comprehension isn;t your strong point. and point 2 is just another of your lame attempts to deflect from the main argument.

Originally posted by yello1
Only because your limited intellect fails to grasp that this game is in BETA and that every game feature should be assessed and suggestions made to adjust it if its nonsensical or over powered or bad for the game over all.


and again, one of your suggestions is filled with people that disagree. but don't let the facts get in your way. your peewee mind doesn't seem to comprehend that chemistry is there for the very reason that you don't like it. for 28 seasons, teams have been winning games with lower chemistry than their opponent, whether you like it or not, that's a fact. Its a SMALL reward for good owners that manage to assemble a team over the long haul. You assume that you'll lose any game that you have a slight chemistry disadvantage against, while the rest of us go out and plan to win, because we don't spend all our time whining about little things and blowing them way out of proportion.

Originally posted by yello1
Only because your limited intellect fails to grasp that this game is in BETA and that every game feature should be assessed and suggestions made to adjust it if its nonsensical or over powered or bad for the game over all.

Chemistry is all three.

Your luddite herd mind may not realize it, or be capable of imagining something better, but mine is.

And so I post.

Meanwhile, Guppy swims around happily in his own toilet water and tells us its just the way it should be.




There you go showing that pompous JA quality again. Your attacks on peoples intellect is so funny. Considering we are talking about a online game and not real life. So on this game knowledge of the game is usually represented in championships won or individual player awards. So yello1 I think you may want to refrain from talking about someones knowledge. Especially when looking at your profile it is sort of hard to see why anyone would listen to much of anything you say.

Originally posted by yello1
Originally posted by merenoise

It has an effect across the board, although it is a fairly small effect. Good teams find ways to win despite chemistry issues. Bad teams find ways to lose independent of chemistry problems. Chemistry doesn't need revamping, it does exactly what it needs to do.

Good teams find a way only because of the disparity in the leagues. If they had 15 other teams of equal quality, chemistry would screw them over in the face of teams that did not have the chemistry problem.

But as it is, I see you agree

Chemistry makes the Rich get Richer and the Poor Poorer.

Trying to save it is pointless then.

Another +1 for getting rid of chemistry as feeding the imbalances in the leagues.

You really can't possibly be that dense. You are being so obtuse in this thread that it is making Jesus cry blood tears and his father the Spaghetti Monster is threatening another flood.

If you put 16 teams of completely equal dots in a conference and had different owners and coordinators I guarantee that the better coordinators would win even if you gave all of them max chemistry penalties and gave the crappier coordinators 0 penalty. The more apathetic or spread thin coordinators would still lose. Has nothing to do with the rich getting richer. Has everything to do with some people just being better at the game. You would be well served to watch what those people do and try to learn from them rather than creating imaginary reasons why you are bad at this.

Originally posted by yello1
But the ones with a FULL brain are able to see that when 90% of the teams in a league and many WORLD LEAGUE teams have the problem that it is not in fact about me, but rather GLB as a whole.

Here is where your argument falls apart. If 90% of the teams in a league and most WL teams have the problem and some of them are winning while others are losing then how is chemistry the problem?

( + / - ) 0

Actually Chemistry is good as it is, However, is it?

(Wiki) --> http://wiki.goallineblitz.com/index.php/Chemistry#Calculating_your_team.27s_chemistry

Chemistry Refills

Chemistry is refilled each night (including the offseason) using the following formula, up to 70: <pre> ((100 - current chemistry) / 20), rounded to the nearest integer</pre>

Amount Gain
10 5
11-30 4
31-50 3
51-70 2
70-99 1
100 0

True, a team that stays together should be benefited....
Not an argument there.

A team that reshuffles, Should have a problem.

So maybe a little readjustments for something in the middle should be at play..

Amount Gain (Suggestion)
0-30 5
31-50 4
51-70 3
71-85 2
86-99 1
100 0

This would speed up Just a little, However even Help the top teams that lose the Dots that only want to start and not play back up.
55 man roster, Not everyone can be in a starting Positions. We all know this.

This is just an ideal, to help with the Compromise. It appears, that a lot agree that is is fine like it is, and a lot dissagree with the current system.

To me, either way is fine..

I would say that I could get behind something like with a team victory would earn you an additional point in chemistry since a win, during a chemistry lull, should boost a teams spirits. But Yello wouldn't like that since he'd have to actually win to get this benefit.

As I said earlier you could also go with tying high confidence into having a positive effect for that player to help avoid the full effects of the chemistry hit.

But getting rid of the only benefit a team that sticks together has, just because you can't con the same group of agents to stay with you more then a season is the stupid way of doing things. IT"S A TEAM SPORT, YOU HAVE TO LEARN TO WORK TOGETHER!!!!!!!!

Originally posted by hatchman
it is funny how everyone is wrong except you I think you need to take a long honest look in the mirror and see that you are the problem with your teams. It isn't the game that is holding your teams back from having success it is you as a owner that is letting your teams down.

My teams have nothing to do with the World League and other Oceania Pro teams with chemistry problems.

My teams have nothing to do with releasing a kicker midseason making a team suffer a .1% across the board penalty to performance. Why>??>

My teams have nothing to do with how stupid the chemistry system is.

Its just stupid.