User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Position Talk > CB Club > Who builds the great CBS in glb ?
Page:
 
Homage
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by blackrock
I mean better CBs will have fewer targets all other things being equal. Rates of defending passes is just not a very good metric.


I don't think you understand how QB targetting works.
 
Homage
offline
Link
 
In other news... I just mixed Cocoa Nuggets and Cocoa Puffs together. Brilliant.
 
MoJames
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Homage
I don't think you understand how QB targetting works.


QB targetting works?
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by blackrock
I'm not sure what your argument is. Are you suggesting that CB quality in GLB is not related to number of targets?


Of course it isn't. I don't look at hood in a gameplan and say oh man...im staying away from lhf's cb. If I got 1 on 1 with his cb im going to take it any chance I can get.
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by MoJames
QB targetting works?


Mind fucked
 
Homage
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by MoJames
QB targetting works?


He seems to think his CB is better because the QB passes him over in single coverage and then instantly throws into triple coverage.
 
Longhornfan1024
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick

I wasn't his target, he just knew I'd chime in to fuck with LHF too.


This thread is over your head.
 
Homage
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
Of course it isn't. I don't look at hood in a gameplan and say oh man...im staying away from lhf's cb. If I got 1 on 1 with his cb im going to take it any chance I can get.


Which is a hell of a lot more than a chance. It's a successful completion to Kit.
 
blackrock
offline
Link
 
QB targeting may not be done well in GLB, but that's irrelevant. If the metric is performance in GLB, then, by definition, better CBs will have fewer targets. A pass not thrown is always a pass not caught.
 
MoJames
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by blackrock
QB targeting may not be done well in GLB, but that's irrelevant. If the metric is performance in GLB, then, by definition, better CBs will have fewer targets. A pass not thrown is always a pass not caught.


 
Homage
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by blackrock
QB targeting may not be done well in GLB, but that's irrelevant. If the metric is performance in GLB, then, by definition, better CBs will have fewer targets. A pass not thrown is always a pass not caught.


THATS IT GUYS, LOCK ER UP
 
Robbnva
online
Link
 
Originally posted by Homage
This whole fucking thread is a well crafted Dpride Mindbomb to fuck with JD and LHF.

And to no ones surprise, it worked guys.


it doesn't take much to get balick riled up. Just post something that anyone who actually knows anything about RL football or GLB dotball, and he will fumble all over himself trying to prove you wrong, even thought it's a well known fact that he is wrong.
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Homage
Which is a hell of a lot more than a chance. It's a successful completion to Kit.


Kit could complete 80% against the quad coverage of 2 jd and 2 lhf corners combined.
 
Homage
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
Kit could complete 80% against the quad coverage of 2 jd and 2 lhf corners combined.


THAT WOULD BE AGAINST THE BEST COLLECTION OF CBS EVAR
 
Homage
offline
Link
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqcTVVUFnKQ
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.