I'm totally on board except for the not being able to move someone when set to man without move, that is a feature used a lot and there really is no good reason to take it away. The reason behind the blitz thing was to take away loads of exploit blitzes, there is clearly no major exploit happening here, so leave that part as is.
If I want my player to have different leverage on a player then I should be able to move him. A good example of the need for this is vs Gun, where the HB is already aligned closer to the tackle. If my LB is slower than him I should be able to align him outside the HB so he doesn't lose leverage.
Originally posted by Pebbles28 I'm totally on board except for the not being able to move someone when set to man without move, that is a feature used a lot and there really is no good reason to take it away. The reason behind the blitz thing was to take away loads of exploit blitzes, there is clearly no major exploit happening here, so leave that part as is.
If I want my player to have different leverage on a player then I should be able to move him. A good example of the need for this is vs Gun, where the HB is already aligned closer to the tackle. If my LB is slower than him I should be able to align him outside the HB so he doesn't lose leverage.