You're not the first time to use this exploit blitz, you're just the first one to use it for an entire game, fail, then try and deny that you were exploiting.
Glad you feel good about it.
Glad you feel good about it.
Forum > Pro Leagues > lolStewart
blln4lyf
offline
offline
Originally posted by sunshineduck
You're not the first time to use this exploit blitz, you're just the first one to use it for an entire game, fail, then try and deny that you were exploiting.
Glad you feel good about it.
Don't think I've ever seen anyone use that blitz before, though I don't watch every game.
You're not the first time to use this exploit blitz, you're just the first one to use it for an entire game, fail, then try and deny that you were exploiting.
Glad you feel good about it.
Don't think I've ever seen anyone use that blitz before, though I don't watch every game.
23yrwej
offline
offline
Originally posted by kanaan
Originally posted by jrry32
Ok but you drop the NT out so that's 3 people rushing vs. OT, OG and C so it's not overload. If you rush the extra player, they also have the RB in the backfield to block. Overload is rushing more than the offense has to block, you are matching what the offense has but the DT/NT dropping back confuses the OL so that the OG and Center don't see the blitzer...I found that out in S11, Bort has never fixed it lol. Overloading would be if you kept the NT in and brought 6 rushers vs. the 5 OLs and the HB and TE went out on the play. NTs IRL aren't dropped that often, on GLB they are good to drop because it really screws with the OL mechanics.
you can overload one side of the O-line with having the same amount of blitzers as you do O-linemen.
How, you might ask
simple my DT was lined up over the LG, my MLB was lined up over the RT, my RDE was line up outside of the RT, and my ROLB was line up outside of my DE off the line, when you have 4 people blitzing against just the RT and RG( the C is comfused bc of the NT dropping back) that is overloading the left side of the offensive line, i didnt say i brought more blitzers than the O-line can handle, i overloaded one side
Ok here are the 3 problems, 1 many of the blitzes that succeeded, you either didn't bring the ROLB or the MLB got the sack before the ROLB was near the OL, 2 unlike IRL, QBs aren't smart enough to scramble away from the overloading side and 3 you blitzed the MLB through a gap that would never be open IRL. Come on, it was exploit blitzing.
Originally posted by jrry32
Ok but you drop the NT out so that's 3 people rushing vs. OT, OG and C so it's not overload. If you rush the extra player, they also have the RB in the backfield to block. Overload is rushing more than the offense has to block, you are matching what the offense has but the DT/NT dropping back confuses the OL so that the OG and Center don't see the blitzer...I found that out in S11, Bort has never fixed it lol. Overloading would be if you kept the NT in and brought 6 rushers vs. the 5 OLs and the HB and TE went out on the play. NTs IRL aren't dropped that often, on GLB they are good to drop because it really screws with the OL mechanics.
you can overload one side of the O-line with having the same amount of blitzers as you do O-linemen.
How, you might ask
simple my DT was lined up over the LG, my MLB was lined up over the RT, my RDE was line up outside of the RT, and my ROLB was line up outside of my DE off the line, when you have 4 people blitzing against just the RT and RG( the C is comfused bc of the NT dropping back) that is overloading the left side of the offensive line, i didnt say i brought more blitzers than the O-line can handle, i overloaded one side
Ok here are the 3 problems, 1 many of the blitzes that succeeded, you either didn't bring the ROLB or the MLB got the sack before the ROLB was near the OL, 2 unlike IRL, QBs aren't smart enough to scramble away from the overloading side and 3 you blitzed the MLB through a gap that would never be open IRL. Come on, it was exploit blitzing.
Edited by jrry32 on Dec 22, 2009 21:10:02
23yrwej
offline
offline
Originally posted by blln4lyf
Originally posted by sunshineduck
You're not the first time to use this exploit blitz, you're just the first one to use it for an entire game, fail, then try and deny that you were exploiting.
Glad you feel good about it.
Don't think I've ever seen anyone use that blitz before, though I don't watch every game.
I've seen plays like it used. Hell I created a play like that in S11 except instead of blitzing the MLB, I blitzed the OLB so he would come unblocked off the outside.
Originally posted by sunshineduck
You're not the first time to use this exploit blitz, you're just the first one to use it for an entire game, fail, then try and deny that you were exploiting.
Glad you feel good about it.
Don't think I've ever seen anyone use that blitz before, though I don't watch every game.
I've seen plays like it used. Hell I created a play like that in S11 except instead of blitzing the MLB, I blitzed the OLB so he would come unblocked off the outside.
blln4lyf
offline
offline
Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by blln4lyf
Originally posted by sunshineduck
You're not the first time to use this exploit blitz, you're just the first one to use it for an entire game, fail, then try and deny that you were exploiting.
Glad you feel good about it.
Don't think I've ever seen anyone use that blitz before, though I don't watch every game.
I've seen plays like it used. Hell I created a play like that in S11 except instead of blitzing the MLB, I blitzed the OLB so he would come unblocked off the outside.
I've seen plays like every play ever used, tbh.
Originally posted by blln4lyf
Originally posted by sunshineduck
You're not the first time to use this exploit blitz, you're just the first one to use it for an entire game, fail, then try and deny that you were exploiting.
Glad you feel good about it.
Don't think I've ever seen anyone use that blitz before, though I don't watch every game.
I've seen plays like it used. Hell I created a play like that in S11 except instead of blitzing the MLB, I blitzed the OLB so he would come unblocked off the outside.
I've seen plays like every play ever used, tbh.
Kanaan
offline
offline
Originally posted by sunshineduck
You're not the first time to use this exploit blitz, you're just the first one to use it for an entire game, fail, then try and deny that you were exploiting.
Glad you feel good about it.
did you watch the game or anu of my other games, NO bc i didnt run it all game you dont know what the hell you are talking about
You're not the first time to use this exploit blitz, you're just the first one to use it for an entire game, fail, then try and deny that you were exploiting.
Glad you feel good about it.
did you watch the game or anu of my other games, NO bc i didnt run it all game you dont know what the hell you are talking about
23yrwej
offline
offline
Originally posted by blln4lyf
Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by blln4lyf
Originally posted by sunshineduck
You're not the first time to use this exploit blitz, you're just the first one to use it for an entire game, fail, then try and deny that you were exploiting.
Glad you feel good about it.
Don't think I've ever seen anyone use that blitz before, though I don't watch every game.
I've seen plays like it used. Hell I created a play like that in S11 except instead of blitzing the MLB, I blitzed the OLB so he would come unblocked off the outside.
I've seen plays like every play ever used, tbh.
I haven''t watched many games this year so I really don't know. I don't have to use complicated schemes for the Rams, just let Sacker Backer run around the OL lol.
Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by blln4lyf
Originally posted by sunshineduck
You're not the first time to use this exploit blitz, you're just the first one to use it for an entire game, fail, then try and deny that you were exploiting.
Glad you feel good about it.
Don't think I've ever seen anyone use that blitz before, though I don't watch every game.
I've seen plays like it used. Hell I created a play like that in S11 except instead of blitzing the MLB, I blitzed the OLB so he would come unblocked off the outside.
I've seen plays like every play ever used, tbh.
I haven''t watched many games this year so I really don't know. I don't have to use complicated schemes for the Rams, just let Sacker Backer run around the OL lol.
Kanaan
offline
offline
Originally posted by jrry32
Ok here are the 3 problems, 1 many of the blitzes that succeeded, you either didn't bring the ROLB or the MLB got the sack before the ROLB was near the OL, 2 unlike IRL, QBs aren't smart enough to scramble away from the overloading side and 3 you blitzed the MLB through a gap that would never be open IRL. Come on, it was exploit blitzing.
you are right the MLB would get the sack before the ROLB would even get off the line good, but that is not why i made the play the way i did, i made it with the intent of overloading one side and the reason i drop the NT back is bc i had to have someone drop back in a zone and if i took anyone of the blitzers or D-line off the overload side then it wouldnt be an overload, so this was the only man i could drop back in a zone
i also drop him back in this defense also
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=982311&pbp_id=8981520
Ok here are the 3 problems, 1 many of the blitzes that succeeded, you either didn't bring the ROLB or the MLB got the sack before the ROLB was near the OL, 2 unlike IRL, QBs aren't smart enough to scramble away from the overloading side and 3 you blitzed the MLB through a gap that would never be open IRL. Come on, it was exploit blitzing.
you are right the MLB would get the sack before the ROLB would even get off the line good, but that is not why i made the play the way i did, i made it with the intent of overloading one side and the reason i drop the NT back is bc i had to have someone drop back in a zone and if i took anyone of the blitzers or D-line off the overload side then it wouldnt be an overload, so this was the only man i could drop back in a zone
i also drop him back in this defense also
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=982311&pbp_id=8981520
23yrwej
offline
offline
Originally posted by kanaan
Originally posted by jrry32
Ok here are the 3 problems, 1 many of the blitzes that succeeded, you either didn't bring the ROLB or the MLB got the sack before the ROLB was near the OL, 2 unlike IRL, QBs aren't smart enough to scramble away from the overloading side and 3 you blitzed the MLB through a gap that would never be open IRL. Come on, it was exploit blitzing.
you are right the MLB would get the sack before the ROLB would even get off the line good, but that is not why i made the play the way i did, i made it with the intent of overloading one side and the reason i drop the NT back is bc i had to have someone drop back in a zone and if i took anyone of the blitzers or D-line off the overload side then it wouldnt be an overload, so this was the only man i could drop back in a zone
i also drop him back in this defense also
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=982311&pbp_id=8981520
I don't disagree with dropping the DT/NT back, it's a smart move. You get an extra player in coverage and the OL gets confused, it's a smart move. That's why I have done it as well. In fact, I don't disagree with anything you are doing, it's smart. Keep it up.
Originally posted by jrry32
Ok here are the 3 problems, 1 many of the blitzes that succeeded, you either didn't bring the ROLB or the MLB got the sack before the ROLB was near the OL, 2 unlike IRL, QBs aren't smart enough to scramble away from the overloading side and 3 you blitzed the MLB through a gap that would never be open IRL. Come on, it was exploit blitzing.
you are right the MLB would get the sack before the ROLB would even get off the line good, but that is not why i made the play the way i did, i made it with the intent of overloading one side and the reason i drop the NT back is bc i had to have someone drop back in a zone and if i took anyone of the blitzers or D-line off the overload side then it wouldnt be an overload, so this was the only man i could drop back in a zone
i also drop him back in this defense also
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=982311&pbp_id=8981520
I don't disagree with dropping the DT/NT back, it's a smart move. You get an extra player in coverage and the OL gets confused, it's a smart move. That's why I have done it as well. In fact, I don't disagree with anything you are doing, it's smart. Keep it up.
Edited by jrry32 on Dec 22, 2009 21:25:38
Kanaan
offline
offline
Originally posted by jrry32
I don't disagree with dropping the DT/NT back, it's a smart move. You get an extra player in coverage and the OL gets confused, it's a smart move. That's why I have done it as well. In fact, I don't disagree with anything you are doing, it's smart. Keep it up.
yeah, my team aint doing so well this season is the only real bummer, we have gone 20-12 in the first 2 seasons of the WPL but my offense has been terrible, my run defense has been suspect also
I don't disagree with dropping the DT/NT back, it's a smart move. You get an extra player in coverage and the OL gets confused, it's a smart move. That's why I have done it as well. In fact, I don't disagree with anything you are doing, it's smart. Keep it up.
yeah, my team aint doing so well this season is the only real bummer, we have gone 20-12 in the first 2 seasons of the WPL but my offense has been terrible, my run defense has been suspect also
mwoods07
offline
offline
Originally posted by David Stern
Not sure if its been asked, I mean I have 0 reason to watch halifax dots, I don;t think I have watched 1 second of their games all yr, that being said...
Did halifax leave their te in to block on the left side? Err I mean block on either side...
Did hali leave their HB into block instead of sending him out????
So if you didn't do these things, which sometimes teams need to do in rl to stop the pressure/blitz, is this basically a thread asking bort to nerf the blitzes, because you want perfect blitz pickup without using the TE to passblock, and custom selecting the HB to pass block as well??? Hmmm
So basically you are subscribing to fix this by never sending out your HB or TE? Because if you DO send them out...sack. So basically, for ALL Singleback plays we should just have 1 option for defense (blitz the blocking logic) and 1 play on offense, WR's go out, HB and TE stay in. Because if you run from 3 and 11...well, you may as well just send out the HB on a route. Basically anything that is designed to work everytime is a problem...
Not sure if its been asked, I mean I have 0 reason to watch halifax dots, I don;t think I have watched 1 second of their games all yr, that being said...
Did halifax leave their te in to block on the left side? Err I mean block on either side...
Did hali leave their HB into block instead of sending him out????
So if you didn't do these things, which sometimes teams need to do in rl to stop the pressure/blitz, is this basically a thread asking bort to nerf the blitzes, because you want perfect blitz pickup without using the TE to passblock, and custom selecting the HB to pass block as well??? Hmmm
So basically you are subscribing to fix this by never sending out your HB or TE? Because if you DO send them out...sack. So basically, for ALL Singleback plays we should just have 1 option for defense (blitz the blocking logic) and 1 play on offense, WR's go out, HB and TE stay in. Because if you run from 3 and 11...well, you may as well just send out the HB on a route. Basically anything that is designed to work everytime is a problem...
Originally posted by mwoods07
So basically you are subscribing to fix this by never sending out your HB or TE? Because if you DO send them out...sack. So basically, for ALL Singleback plays we should just have 1 option for defense (blitz the blocking logic) and 1 play on offense, WR's go out, HB and TE stay in. Because if you run from 3 and 11...well, you may as well just send out the HB on a route. Basically anything that is designed to work everytime is a problem...
right, so you have to avoid getting into 3rd and long. which means run on all 1st down and 2nds too. funnnnn!
So basically you are subscribing to fix this by never sending out your HB or TE? Because if you DO send them out...sack. So basically, for ALL Singleback plays we should just have 1 option for defense (blitz the blocking logic) and 1 play on offense, WR's go out, HB and TE stay in. Because if you run from 3 and 11...well, you may as well just send out the HB on a route. Basically anything that is designed to work everytime is a problem...
right, so you have to avoid getting into 3rd and long. which means run on all 1st down and 2nds too. funnnnn!
Dpride59
offline
offline
Originally posted by mwoods07
So basically you are subscribing to fix this by never sending out your HB or TE? Because if you DO send them out...sack. So basically, for ALL Singleback plays we should just have 1 option for defense (blitz the blocking logic) and 1 play on offense, WR's go out, HB and TE stay in. Because if you run from 3 and 11...well, you may as well just send out the HB on a route. Basically anything that is designed to work everytime is a problem...
Well, hb's don't get targeted so why even send them out? Also wr's make better catches in triple coverage then one on one, so I'd rather just have that extra cb in coverage to make a play on the ball, because everybody knows the more defenders conversing on the ball = Higher catch ball %..
So basically you are subscribing to fix this by never sending out your HB or TE? Because if you DO send them out...sack. So basically, for ALL Singleback plays we should just have 1 option for defense (blitz the blocking logic) and 1 play on offense, WR's go out, HB and TE stay in. Because if you run from 3 and 11...well, you may as well just send out the HB on a route. Basically anything that is designed to work everytime is a problem...
Well, hb's don't get targeted so why even send them out? Also wr's make better catches in triple coverage then one on one, so I'd rather just have that extra cb in coverage to make a play on the ball, because everybody knows the more defenders conversing on the ball = Higher catch ball %..
mwoods07
offline
offline
Ugh, I give...it's obvious that fixing a blown radiator hose with duct tape is far easier than replacing the hose so things run the way they should...oh well.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
