Warrior General Games

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
So are those pairings official? I have scrim slots open tbh and I don't particularly care which team you want us to beat...

Yes, I think we can go ahead and get started. We in SEA definitely don't want the ban hammer and/or napalm.

Those of you with open scrim times may as well kick things off, while those of you in tournies can wait until some WL team elminates you...

Challenge sent to Pa Dong Dragons.

Willing to send one to Laos as well, if needed.

EDIT - Send one to Laos as well. If they want to accept it, great. If not, no big deal.

Originally posted by AirMcMVP
Challenge sent to Pa Dong Dragons.

Willing to send one to Laos as well, if needed.

EDIT - Send one to Laos as well. If they want to accept it, great. If not, no big deal.

Very cool of you to include both teams, thanks!

Originally posted by Texan
Here is what the pairing would look like right now:

1) Tet Offensive @ South Otto Fragile Porcelain Mice
2) Minnesota Masterminds @ Portland Dirty Penguins
3) Winona Warriors @ Chicago Hedgehogs
4) Minnesota Marauders @ Myanmar Military Junta
5) Mekong Delta Force @ Atlanta Purple Penguins
6) Ketchikan Kamper Adventure Rentals @ Cambodia Mountain Men
7) Palembang Drunken Monks @ Louisville Baby Kittens
8) SOUTH GEORGIA GROWL @ East St. Louis Tire Fires
9) Sydney Sharks @ Austin Longhorns
10) Over The Rhine Red Dots @ Manila Warlords
11) Phnom Penh Warriors @ Las Vegas Flyin' Elvis
12) Northwest Mighthawks @ Vietnamese Sweatshop
13) Pa Dong Dragons @ Tennessee Fury
*Laos = flying standby

These rankings would work for me, and I also wouldn't care if Tet played LBK and PDP played OTR.. The main issue I see with that is it would then pit SEAPL3 vs USAPL1, SEAPL4 vs USAPL2. AKA it would give SEAPL an excuse to losing if that were to happen.

Originally posted by Galkuris
These rankings would work for me, and I also wouldn't care if Tet played LBK and PDP played OTR.. The main issue I see with that is it would then pit SEAPL3 vs USAPL1, SEAPL4 vs USAPL2. AKA it would give SEAPL an excuse to losing if that were to happen.

I think we're ok with the rankings as they stand. PDP and OTR can play later as kind of a side bet separate from this.

Minneapolis looks like a tremendous team btw. Should be fun.

We're really playing a 1-5 team?... Can you guys just concede that one?

Originally posted by jktooley
We're really playing a 1-5 team?... Can you guys just concede that one?

but SEAPL is a rough and tough league...

Originally posted by Galkuris
These rankings would work for me, and I also wouldn't care if Tet played LBK and PDP played OTR.. The main issue I see with that is it would then pit SEAPL3 vs USAPL1, SEAPL4 vs USAPL2. AKA it would give SEAPL an excuse to losing if that were to happen.

are you expecting it to be within 2 games? really Galk???

Originally posted by Mercaptopropyl
are you expecting it to be within 2 games? really Galk???

Sorry I forgot the etc.

SEAPL3 vs USAPL 1
SEAPL4 vs USAPL 2
SEAPL5 vs USAPL 3
SEAPL6 vs USAPL 4
SEAPL7 vs USAPL 5
SEAPL8 vs USAPL 6
.
.
.
.
.

if we win 13-0 how much can they complain though?

Originally posted by Mercaptopropyl
if we win 13-0 how much can they complain though?

Are you putting the spread at 13?

Originally posted by jktooley
We're really playing a 1-5 team?... Can you guys just concede that one?

Hell no, we will not concede.

Originally posted by Texan
Are you putting the spread at 13?

Are you serious?

speaking of airline food, what's the deal with the SEAPL teams trying to pretend they're in USA Pro by naming themselves after US cities? have you seen this? that guy at table 4 knows what I'm talking about. it's like, could you BE any more jealous, amirite? In USA Pro, it's the Northwest Mighthawks, not the Southeast Mighthawks from where I'm sitting.

don't forget to tip your waitress

Originally posted by Mercaptopropyl
Are you serious?

As serious as a typical government employee's work ethic.

On a more serious note, where would you put the spread on this one?