I noticed a JD sighting in the forums today....why is he not an admin of this site yet? 
Edited by Team Nucleus on Nov 13, 2013 20:27:37
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > GLB Players Association
The main flaw in this is that not all "players" have the same interests.
Then when one of the "association" members makes a decision that doesn't represent an individual's particular interest, they become "The Man" to that particular individual.
That, and moderators basically already fill this role. And you see the same progression of distrust with every new moderator or tester. As soon as bhall agrees with a change, he is forever labeled a brown noser suck up, even if half of the users agree with him. Then the next thing that comes up, half of the half that agreed with him now disagree with him and he sours their trust. Then half of the half of the half lose trust the next gate.
Any active representative that regularly chooses sides is hated by everyone eventually, and those that don't are useless as far as this suggestion goes. Until the day comes when the userbase can unanimously agree on anything, a trusted representative is an oxymoron.
Then when one of the "association" members makes a decision that doesn't represent an individual's particular interest, they become "The Man" to that particular individual.
That, and moderators basically already fill this role. And you see the same progression of distrust with every new moderator or tester. As soon as bhall agrees with a change, he is forever labeled a brown noser suck up, even if half of the users agree with him. Then the next thing that comes up, half of the half that agreed with him now disagree with him and he sours their trust. Then half of the half of the half lose trust the next gate.
Any active representative that regularly chooses sides is hated by everyone eventually, and those that don't are useless as far as this suggestion goes. Until the day comes when the userbase can unanimously agree on anything, a trusted representative is an oxymoron.
Originally posted by Corndog
The main flaw in this is that not all "players" have the same interests.
Then when one of the "association" members makes a decision that doesn't represent an individual's particular interest, they become "The Man" to that particular individual.
That, and moderators basically already fill this role. And you see the same progression of distrust with every new moderator or tester. As soon as bhall agrees with a change, he is forever labeled a brown noser suck up, even if half of the users agree with him. Then the next thing that comes up, half of the half that agreed with him now disagree with him and he sours their trust. Then half of the half of the half lose trust the next gate.
Any active representative that regularly chooses sides is hated by everyone eventually, and those that don't are useless as far as this suggestion goes. Until the day comes when the userbase can unanimously agree on anything, a trusted representative is an oxymoron.
why no references to yourself?
The main flaw in this is that not all "players" have the same interests.
Then when one of the "association" members makes a decision that doesn't represent an individual's particular interest, they become "The Man" to that particular individual.
That, and moderators basically already fill this role. And you see the same progression of distrust with every new moderator or tester. As soon as bhall agrees with a change, he is forever labeled a brown noser suck up, even if half of the users agree with him. Then the next thing that comes up, half of the half that agreed with him now disagree with him and he sours their trust. Then half of the half of the half lose trust the next gate.
Any active representative that regularly chooses sides is hated by everyone eventually, and those that don't are useless as far as this suggestion goes. Until the day comes when the userbase can unanimously agree on anything, a trusted representative is an oxymoron.
why no references to yourself?
Originally posted by Team Nucleus
I noticed a JD sighting in the forums today....why is he not an admin of this site yet?
because JD was always a joke. players association was a huge waste of that guy's time.
I noticed a JD sighting in the forums today....why is he not an admin of this site yet?
because JD was always a joke. players association was a huge waste of that guy's time.
Originally posted by Corndog
The main flaw in this is that not all "players" have the same interests.
Then when one of the "association" members makes a decision that doesn't represent an individual's particular interest, they become "The Man" to that particular individual.
That, and moderators basically already fill this role. And you see the same progression of distrust with every new moderator or tester. As soon as bhall agrees with a change, he is forever labeled a brown noser suck up, even if half of the users agree with him. Then the next thing that comes up, half of the half that agreed with him now disagree with him and he sours their trust. Then half of the half of the half lose trust the next gate.
Any active representative that regularly chooses sides is hated by everyone eventually, and those that don't are useless as far as this suggestion goes. Until the day comes when the userbase can unanimously agree on anything, a trusted representative is an oxymoron.
That's a near sighted view.....I don't care that you are pointing out certain mods but who am I to judge?
The OP is full of suggestions that if taken seriously would work and benefit GLB.
Sure it takes commitment and motivation to get it done but that's where we seem to bump heads....
A lot of you guys don't have those 2 qualifications
Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
because JD was always a joke. players association was a huge waste of that guy's time.
I beg to differ....I personally handled over 30 cases for the original GLBPA and every single one got taken care of....just sayin'
The main flaw in this is that not all "players" have the same interests.
Then when one of the "association" members makes a decision that doesn't represent an individual's particular interest, they become "The Man" to that particular individual.
That, and moderators basically already fill this role. And you see the same progression of distrust with every new moderator or tester. As soon as bhall agrees with a change, he is forever labeled a brown noser suck up, even if half of the users agree with him. Then the next thing that comes up, half of the half that agreed with him now disagree with him and he sours their trust. Then half of the half of the half lose trust the next gate.
Any active representative that regularly chooses sides is hated by everyone eventually, and those that don't are useless as far as this suggestion goes. Until the day comes when the userbase can unanimously agree on anything, a trusted representative is an oxymoron.
That's a near sighted view.....I don't care that you are pointing out certain mods but who am I to judge?
The OP is full of suggestions that if taken seriously would work and benefit GLB.
Sure it takes commitment and motivation to get it done but that's where we seem to bump heads....
A lot of you guys don't have those 2 qualifications
Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
because JD was always a joke. players association was a huge waste of that guy's time.
I beg to differ....I personally handled over 30 cases for the original GLBPA and every single one got taken care of....just sayin'
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
