Warrior General Games

Originally posted by bhall43
I listed 3 total. 2 AEQ's and a CEQ.

Ok, then depending on which, CB, safety or LB is which is getting what with AEQ or CEQ. Depends on the roll of those positions in my D. There is some variance for the individual, it's their dot. They all wanted to take on this big build experiment, agreed with my logic or just want to see the outcome of something different, but still their dot.

Originally posted by StudMuffin
anyone here think they can DC a full team of 2 AEQ dots?



it would probably look something like this against some WL teams.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2331653

Originally posted by Dr. E
Originally posted by O' HappyCow

do you understand everything you write? why are people who are good at the game arguing with you?

Well, I'm not sure. See my first post and ask yourself, why? Of course not all are arguing. Some are actually discussing, some have contributed in the manner the post was intended. As for the others, I'm open to discussion, I'm old enough I can handle comments from people who don't agree with me.

post less, read more

Originally posted by Dr. E
Originally posted by lemdog

I wish I I could make the playoffs in Pro

Is that your mark of "achievement" ?

at this point yeah, i mean I would love to win pro gold at some point but i just don't have the coordinators to get it done.

Originally posted by O' HappyCow
post less, read more

uh this guy was asked to be tester, he doesnt need to read more

Originally posted by bhall43
it would probably look something like this against some WL teams.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2331653



Or maybe this:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2165627
http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2196113

Although most ended up something like this:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2199608

Take a look at the skill point totals for some of those dots and you will see clearly why we weren't competitive on the WL level or really, against the best of the Pro leagues either.

Originally posted by bhall43
it would probably look something like this against some WL teams.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2331653



http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2332040

lost but at level 68 vs 79s...

are the hedgehogs in the quick scrim list?.....ill take a few hours to see if i can find and send a quick scrim lol

Originally posted by Dr. E
Achieve. Well, guess you need to define what is achieve for an answer. If it's make pro, already did that, but you missed it. If it's make playoffs in pro, did that. Be asked to be a tester, did that. If it's make WL, not done that, beat a few WL teams, had fair games in most match ups against them, but discovered too many builds on the team were truly average, that the Agents who had been inactive for three seasons made it a bit tougher to win and the lack of avoid fake equipment killed us. And most important of all, if you can't score in the WL, you are going to end up in a morale spiral, we all know where that ends up.

Achieve would be winning. Making pro means nothing. Making playoffs in pro means nothing. Winning pro is nice, but nothing to write home about. Making WL is somewhat impressive. Consistently making the playoffs in WL is a pretty good accomplishment considering how hard it is to be consistently good enough to do so and how hard it is to win WL. Building dots that are playmakers on perennial WL playoff teams is a great achievement for those users who don't coordinate. Winning WL whether as a dot builder or a coordinator is the most important accomplishment. All of the people in this thread who are telling you that you are wrong have won WL and have dots on your coordinate on teams that are perennial WL playoff teams. They have actual achievements. You do not.

Originally posted by Dr. E
Or maybe this:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2165627
http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2196113

Although most ended up something like this:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2199608

Take a look at the skill point totals for some of those dots and you will see clearly why we weren't competitive on the WL level or really, against the best of the Pro leagues either.

My reg pro declining dots team beat a WL team, too. It's nothing to write home about. Bad teams can make WL through a shitty pro conference. Elite teams make the playoffs consistently. Play an elite team.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Achieve would be winning. Making pro means nothing. Making playoffs in pro means nothing. Winning pro is nice, but nothing to write home about. Making WL is somewhat impressive. Consistently making the playoffs in WL is a pretty good accomplishment considering how hard it is to be consistently good enough to do so and how hard it is to win WL. Building dots that are playmakers on perennial WL playoff teams is a great achievement for those users who don't coordinate. Winning WL whether as a dot builder or a coordinator is the most important accomplishment. All of the people in this thread who are telling you that you are wrong have won WL and have dots on your coordinate on teams that are perennial WL playoff teams. They have actual achievements. You do not.

Ahh, Ok. Nice standard, then again, I think everyone in the game believes winning WL is the ultimate mark of achievement.

Tell me. How important to winning in WL is it to have a team full of Agents that build WL quality Dots. If you think it's very important, how long do you think it would take for a new owner entering the game to recruit a stable of Agents who can build WL quality dots in the positions needed for the team to succeed?
Finally, what does anything you are saying have to do with "Just looking for guys trying this build style. I might be in the market for a Dot or two for my team which is by a large majority, two aeq builds using a system developed by my Head Coach." which of course is the purpose of the thread. Everything else is trolls.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
My reg pro declining dots team beat a WL team, too. It's nothing to write home about. Bad teams can make WL through a shitty pro conference. Elite teams make the playoffs consistently. Play an elite team.

If you go back and read, maybe you will see this part "we weren't competitive on the WL level or really, against the best of the Pro leagues either. "

I had no illusions about the team, hence the rebuild.

Originally posted by Dr. E
Ahh, Ok. Nice standard, then again, I think everyone in the game believes winning WL is the ultimate mark of achievement.

Tell me. How important to winning in WL is it to have a team full of Agents that build WL quality Dots. If you think it's very important, how long do you think it would take for a new owner entering the game to recruit a stable of Agents who can build WL quality dots in the positions needed for the team to succeed?
Finally, what does anything you are saying have to do with "Just looking for guys trying this build style. I might be in the market for a Dot or two for my team which is by a large majority, two aeq builds using a system developed by my Head Coach." which of course is the purpose of the thread. Everything else is trolls.

The discussion has become whether 2 AEQ dots is a valid strategy. You are the only person in this thread claiming that it is a valid strategy. You have no achievement in this game. All of the other agents in this thread who are telling you that you are wrong have all achieved success in this game. The point of my original post was that you should step back and consider that there might be a reason why they have achieved success and you haven't. Instead of fighting with them and trying to win with a flawed argument, maybe you should listen to their advice and apply it to the way you play the game. Maybe then you will see some success.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Achieve would be winning. Making pro means nothing. Making playoffs in pro means nothing. Winning pro is nice, but nothing to write home about. Making WL is somewhat impressive. Consistently making the playoffs in WL is a pretty good accomplishment considering how hard it is to be consistently good enough to do so and how hard it is to win WL. Building dots that are playmakers on perennial WL playoff teams is a great achievement for those users who don't coordinate. Winning WL whether as a dot builder or a coordinator is the most important accomplishment. All of the people in this thread who are telling you that you are wrong have won WL and have dots on your coordinate on teams that are perennial WL playoff teams. They have actual achievements. You do not.

I beg to differ. Winning pro is something to write home about. You just stfu.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
The discussion has become whether 2 AEQ dots is a valid strategy. You are the only person in this thread claiming that it is a valid strategy. You have no achievement in this game. All of the other agents in this thread who are telling you that you are wrong have all achieved success in this game. The point of my original post was that you should step back and consider that there might be a reason why they have achieved success and you haven't. Instead of fighting with them and trying to win with a flawed argument, maybe you should listen to their advice and apply it to the way you play the game. Maybe then you will see some success.

Ahh, I understand now. You are trying to give me friendly advice. Noted!

But, when last I was in pro league, there was a team of 2AEQ dots that was doing rather poorly and the Owner was a bit active in the forums and so taking some heat. I took a look at his teams effective level and Wow!! Well, it happened that at the same time I had an Agent on the team who had I think three dots with me and they too were 2 AEQ builds. About this same time, the forums are full of complaints that a LB can't cover a TE and the coverage for HB coming out of the backfield is broken and as we all know later Bort adjusted that portion of the game. IT was no different for me, couldn't cover those routes, except when this Agent's dots were on the TE or HB, covered them then. So that all got me to wondering if the problem with that guys team full of 2AEQ dots was his AI or scouting & game prep. So I had the Agent, my head coach by the way, write up his build method and I presented it too the team and asked who wanted to try a grand experiment. See if 2AEQ dots can get the job done. So there you have it, why we are doing what we are doing. Say it's doomed to failure if you like, but I have already seen dots build under this method are superior in play, the only question now is can it be done with every position or will the small disadvantages of the build system create too many problems. In the mean time, we are doing something different than we did before, much more fun that rinse & repeat.

While neither endorsing or condemning 2 aeq dots I do have one if you wish to view some film .http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2484021 Has never played at the highest levels of competition nor am i what anyone would call an elite builder ( i definitely could of improved his build efficiency a bit etc etc. I just built him to hit the 99 lolbar and see if he could produce . I have to say the results haven't been particularly positive or negative . Hes not been terribly low on energy which was a concern nor has he been a very strong performer more of I would say average . if anyone wants to test him out on an experimental team this season or next feel free to contact me . Hes on a cpu team now since I was just too lazy about looking for teams this last offseason .