Warrior General Games

Originally posted by We_Rule



I actually laughed out loud at this. Porto prb wont lose a game until after their chem is 100 if history serves, and they could prb beat your team with defense alone and their kicker at QB.



So then chemistry is a pointless thing to have since it has no effect on play?

Okay, lets get rid of it then.

Originally posted by yello1
So then chemistry is a pointless thing to have since it has no effect on play?

Okay, lets get rid of it then.

No.

Its "effect on play" is to punish mediocre-to-bad teams that have high roster turnover.

Bad teams that keep their roster largely intact will have a slight advantage in the early part of the season, for whatever that is worth.

Good teams that have roster turnover will find a way to hang on and be ready come time for the playoffs.

Originally posted by yello1
Originally posted by hatchman

I moved a entire team from casual to a regular team and my chemistry is in the crapper. yet I am willing to about bet that even though my team is in the strongest league at their age level that I make the playoffs and still have a shot at contending for a championship at seasons end. decent owners with good builds on their teams can still be competitive even when their chemistry is in the crapper.

Yello1 your problem here just isn't chemistry your problem also stems from you yourself. you do not pay alot of attention to your teams. seriously no need to try to argue this point. especially since you have so many teams and yet you spend a ton of time making suggestions when you could use that time alot better. another aspect that you aren't considering is the players on the teams aren't the best built dots from what I have looked at. so your problems are no where near just chemistry.

basically this suggestion screams of you making a excuse for being a crappy owner and fielding crappy teams. I am sorry if this makes you mad or hurts your feelings. I am also sorry to all your little minions that I am sure I will start hearing from with their usual threats. seriously yello1 if you want to blame something for your teams not being able to be successful. simply get out of the computer chair and walk to the nearest mirror. and when you do the person looking back at you is who you need to blame for having crappy teams that can't compete.


Blah Blah Blah

Its not about me.

Its about ALL of the teams with 60 to 70 chemistry.

Either it has an effect, or it doesnt.

Which is it?



It has an effect across the board, although it is a fairly small effect. Good teams find ways to win despite chemistry issues. Bad teams find ways to lose independent of chemistry problems. Chemistry doesn't need revamping, it does exactly what it needs to do.

Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
All your suggestions are ALL about you and your inability to comprehend the game so you come up with whacked out idea after whacked out idea after whacked out idea.




Its that in a nutshell. Just lock all of his suggestions until he gets that what he's doing is attempting to get the game to bail him out for not getting it, instead of him waking up and adapting to the game.

Originally posted by yello1

Either it has an effect, or it doesnt.

Which is it?



yes it has a SMALL impact. teams with the smallest of clues can compensate. Clueless people can't.

Originally posted by yello1
You do not understand drama.
yes, we all understand now that you are nothing but a drama queen.

Originally posted by Larry Roadgrader

Its that in a nutshell. Just lock all of his suggestions until he gets that what he's doing is attempting to get the game to bail him out for not getting it, instead of him waking up and adapting to the game.

pigs will fly before he ever admits that he is clueless. ever notice that he can't even figure out how to answer multiple quotes in a single response. no way he'll ever get enough brain cells to comprehend how glb actually works. none of his ideas are ever about his team, yet he seems to be the only one that bitches about the easiest things. I'm waiting for his to suggest removing stamina from the game, or have i forgotten that one already?

he acts like 2% is this HUGE factor. 2% off of 48 isnt even a full point, and even at 70 its only 1.4 pts. hell, thats less difference than most bad builds compared to good builds.

Originally posted by yello1
Originally posted by hatchman

I moved a entire team from casual to a regular team and my chemistry is in the crapper. yet I am willing to about bet that even though my team is in the strongest league at their age level that I make the playoffs and still have a shot at contending for a championship at seasons end. decent owners with good builds on their teams can still be competitive even when their chemistry is in the crapper.

Yello1 your problem here just isn't chemistry your problem also stems from you yourself. you do not pay alot of attention to your teams. seriously no need to try to argue this point. especially since you have so many teams and yet you spend a ton of time making suggestions when you could use that time alot better. another aspect that you aren't considering is the players on the teams aren't the best built dots from what I have looked at. so your problems are no where near just chemistry.

basically this suggestion screams of you making a excuse for being a crappy owner and fielding crappy teams. I am sorry if this makes you mad or hurts your feelings. I am also sorry to all your little minions that I am sure I will start hearing from with their usual threats. seriously yello1 if you want to blame something for your teams not being able to be successful. simply get out of the computer chair and walk to the nearest mirror. and when you do the person looking back at you is who you need to blame for having crappy teams that can't compete.


Blah Blah Blah

Its not about me.

Its about ALL of the teams with 60 to 70 chemistry.

Either it has an effect, or it doesnt.

Which is it?



You really need to stop saying this isn't about you. because as anyone with half a brain can see it is. you make all these suggestions to try to make the game change to make it so that you can be a decent owner with success. which you could be without the game changing for you. seriously spend less time making dumb suggestions and focus on your teams and you would see a big difference in your success.

-1

Originally posted by hatchman
You really need to stop saying this isn't about you. because as anyone with half a brain can see it is. you make all these suggestions to try to make the game change to make it so that you can be a decent owner with success. which you could be without the game changing for you. seriously spend less time making dumb suggestions and focus on your teams and you would see a big difference in your success.

+1 to this well put hatch

Originally posted by Larry Roadgrader
No.

Its "effect on play" is to punish mediocre-to-bad teams that have high roster turnover.

Bad teams that keep their roster largely intact will have a slight advantage in the early part of the season, for whatever that is worth.

Good teams that have roster turnover will find a way to hang on and be ready come time for the playoffs.

So then you agree Chemistry is a system that punishes only the teams that are already losing

Thereby being a Rich Get Richer Poor Get Poorer broken system and therefore should be removed.

I agree completely.

+1 to Removing Chemistry.

Originally posted by hatchman
You really need to stop saying this isn't about you. because as anyone with half a brain can see it is. .

Well I will have to take your word for it.

But the ones with a FULL brain are able to see that when 90% of the teams in a league and many WORLD LEAGUE teams have the problem that it is not in fact about me, but rather GLB as a whole.

Originally posted by merenoise
It has an effect across the board, although it is a fairly small effect. Good teams find ways to win despite chemistry issues. Bad teams find ways to lose independent of chemistry problems. Chemistry doesn't need revamping, it does exactly what it needs to do.

Good teams find a way only because of the disparity in the leagues. If they had 15 other teams of equal quality, chemistry would screw them over in the face of teams that did not have the chemistry problem.

But as it is, I see you agree

Chemistry makes the Rich get Richer and the Poor Poorer.

Trying to save it is pointless then.

Another +1 for getting rid of chemistry as feeding the imbalances in the leagues.

Originally posted by Guppy, Inc

he acts like 2% is this HUGE factor. 2% off of 48 isnt even a full point, and even at 70 its only 1.4 pts. hell, thats less difference than most bad builds compared to good builds.



Okay so you are in the "Chemistry is irrelevant" camp then.

I agree

Lets get rid of chemistry, it doesn't do anything.

Another +1 to Removing Chemistry from the game completely.

LOL you guys are frakking amusing how completely incapable you are of forming cogent thoughts.

Originally posted by Larry Roadgrader

Its that in a nutshell. Just lock all of his suggestions until he gets that what he's doing is attempting to get the game to bail him out for not getting it, instead of him waking up and adapting to the game.

yeah, I own all those other teams with low chemistry in OPro and World League.

its all about me.

Originally posted by yello1
Originally posted by hatchman

You really need to stop saying this isn't about you. because as anyone with half a brain can see it is. .

Well I will have to take your word for it.

But the ones with a FULL brain are able to see that when 90% of the teams in a league and many WORLD LEAGUE teams have the problem that it is not in fact about me, but rather GLB as a whole.

then if it isn't about you for the most part why then do I not have that big of a problem even with worse chemistry than your teams have? and my team is in the toughest league that there is at my age level. the whole thing you don't get is that your problem isn't chemistry your teams could have full chemistry and still get beat by decent teams. so your philosophy of the rich getting richer here is full of holes. simply because chemistry is the same for everyone. there is no chemistry script or some way to cheat.

seriously Yello1 you need to stop trying to find excuses and just simply go look in the mirror. and when you do that then you will see why your teams get beat. it is in fact you that is your biggest problem. instead of you trying to learn more about how the game is played and how to build better players or how to coordinate. you choose to waste not only your time but our time making a ton of suggestions that are basically bandaid crap to help you and your teams not have to put in the work to get better.

But since I do sort of like you I am going to give you some super secret insider knowledge. If you do not want to deal with chemistry issues (now listen real close here junior this is the key) Sign players to the team that can help the team and that will stay with the team. stop signing crappy built dots that are just there to occupy space. and the main thing is for you to start working to make your teams better and spend the needed time working on your teams instead of making suggestions all the time.

also another point I wanted to touch on is you keep referring to the other WL and Pro teams. but the thing is none of them are in here arguing for this suggestion to be implemented. so it looks more and more like you are the one witht he problem. especially since most every other owner in the game knows and understands how to deal with chemistry issues and understands that chemistry is there to stop people from having a roster full of crappy builds and getting put into a lesser league. then once they are there they drop everyone and sign a full team of ringers to win a lower league.